GHSA-GWQP-9QGW-C5PV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 03:30 – Updated: 2026-09-11 06:31The nscd service in the GNU C Library 2.3.4 onwards may crash due to a stack overflow when a malicious DNS server returns too large a response for a DNS query, resulting in degraded DNS resolution for the system.
Exploitation of this bug needs a system that has nscd enabled and using an untrusted DNS server for name resolution, with the compromised DNS server being capable of processing records large enough to result in a stack overflow in an nscd thread stack. During experimentation, bind 9 was unable to handle large records, but that could change in future or with a different name server. In typical installations, nscd is executed in an isolated context as its own user without a shell, due to which any compromise of that service is isolated.
There is a remote possibility of nscd cache corruption if an attacker manages to get the stack pointer into a desired point in the heap, potentially resulting in other caches in nscd being overwritten with corrupt data through the stack overflow, until the buggy code path eventually results in a crash.
Finally, a crash in nscd may result in performance degradation when resolving names, but it does not result in a denial of service.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-89092"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-789"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T02:18:35Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The nscd service in the GNU C Library 2.3.4 onwards may crash due to a \nstack overflow when a malicious DNS server returns too large a response \nfor a DNS query, resulting in degraded DNS resolution for the system.\n\n\n\nExploitation of this bug needs a system that has nscd enabled and using \nan untrusted DNS server for name resolution, with the compromised DNS \nserver being capable of processing records large enough to result in a \nstack overflow in an nscd thread stack.\u00a0 During experimentation, bind 9 \nwas unable to handle large records, but that could change in future or \nwith a different name server.\u00a0 In typical installations, nscd is \nexecuted in an isolated context as its own user without a shell, due to \nwhich any compromise of that service is isolated.\n\n\n\nThere is a remote possibility of nscd cache corruption if an attacker \nmanages to get the stack pointer into a desired point in the heap, \npotentially resulting in other caches in nscd being overwritten with \ncorrupt data through the stack overflow, until the buggy code path \neventually results in a crash.\n\n\n\nFinally, a crash in nscd may result in performance degradation when \nresolving names, but it does not result in a denial of service.",
"id": "GHSA-gwqp-9qgw-c5pv",
"modified": "2026-09-11T06:31:12Z",
"published": "2026-09-11T03:30:22Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89092"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34624"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob_plain;f=advisories/GLIBC-SA-2026-0016"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/11/2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.