ghsa-gx9j-r5m2-p97g
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-09-30 00:00
Modified
2022-10-04 00:00
Severity ?
Details
Qemu before 1.6.2 block diver for the various disk image formats used by Bochs and for the QCOW version 2 format, are vulnerable to a possible crash caused by signed data types or a logic error while creating QCOW2 snapshots, which leads to incorrectly calling update_refcount() routine.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2014-0147" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-190" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2022-09-29T03:15:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Qemu before 1.6.2 block diver for the various disk image formats used by Bochs and for the QCOW version 2 format, are vulnerable to a possible crash caused by signed data types or a logic error while creating QCOW2 snapshots, which leads to incorrectly calling update_refcount() routine.", "id": "GHSA-gx9j-r5m2-p97g", "modified": "2022-10-04T00:00:19Z", "published": "2022-09-30T00:00:34Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-0147" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078848" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086717" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=246f65838d19db6db55bfb41117c35645a2c4789" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=246f65838d19db6db55bfb41117c35645a2c4789" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0420.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0421.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/03/26/8" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.