GHSA-GX9J-R5M2-P97G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-09-30 00:00 – Updated: 2022-10-04 00:00
VLAI?
Details
Qemu before 1.6.2 block diver for the various disk image formats used by Bochs and for the QCOW version 2 format, are vulnerable to a possible crash caused by signed data types or a logic error while creating QCOW2 snapshots, which leads to incorrectly calling update_refcount() routine.
Severity ?
6.2 (Medium)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-0147"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-190"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2022-09-29T03:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Qemu before 1.6.2 block diver for the various disk image formats used by Bochs and for the QCOW version 2 format, are vulnerable to a possible crash caused by signed data types or a logic error while creating QCOW2 snapshots, which leads to incorrectly calling update_refcount() routine.",
"id": "GHSA-gx9j-r5m2-p97g",
"modified": "2022-10-04T00:00:19Z",
"published": "2022-09-30T00:00:34Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-0147"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078848"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086717"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=246f65838d19db6db55bfb41117c35645a2c4789"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=246f65838d19db6db55bfb41117c35645a2c4789"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0420.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0421.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/03/26/8"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…