ghsa-h49r-cwwr-2hv6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 00:52
Modified
2022-05-14 00:52
Severity ?
Details
An issue was discovered in BusyBox through 1.30.0. An out of bounds read in udhcp components (consumed by the DHCP server, client, and/or relay) might allow a remote attacker to leak sensitive information from the stack by sending a crafted DHCP message. This is related to assurance of a 4-byte length when decoding DHCP_SUBNET. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-20679.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2019-5747", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-125", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2019-01-09T16:29:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "An issue was discovered in BusyBox through 1.30.0. An out of bounds read in udhcp components (consumed by the DHCP server, client, and/or relay) might allow a remote attacker to leak sensitive information from the stack by sending a crafted DHCP message. This is related to assurance of a 4-byte length when decoding DHCP_SUBNET. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-20679.", id: "GHSA-h49r-cwwr-2hv6", modified: "2022-05-14T00:52:07Z", published: "2022-05-14T00:52:07Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-5747", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11506", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=74d9f1ba37010face4bd1449df4d60dd84450b06", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Sep/7", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3935-1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/154361/Cisco-Device-Hardcoded-Credentials-GNU-glibc-BusyBox.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Sep/7", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.