ghsa-hf23-9pf7-388p
Vulnerability from github
Published
2019-07-26 16:09
Modified
2025-04-01 16:33
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
Deserialization of Untrusted Data and Code Injection in xstream
Details

It was found that xstream API version 1.4.10 before 1.4.11 introduced a regression for a previous deserialization flaw. If the security framework has not been initialized, it may allow a remote attacker to run arbitrary shell commands when unmarshalling XML or any supported format. e.g. JSON. (regression of CVE-2013-7285)

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
   affected: [
      {
         database_specific: {
            last_known_affected_version_range: "<= 1.4.10",
         },
         package: {
            ecosystem: "Maven",
            name: "com.thoughtworks.xstream:xstream",
         },
         ranges: [
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "0",
                  },
                  {
                     fixed: "1.4.11",
                  },
               ],
               type: "ECOSYSTEM",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2019-10173",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-502",
         "CWE-94",
      ],
      github_reviewed: true,
      github_reviewed_at: "2019-07-25T10:11:50Z",
      nvd_published_at: "2019-07-23T13:15:00Z",
      severity: "CRITICAL",
   },
   details: "It was found that xstream API version 1.4.10 before 1.4.11 introduced a regression for a previous deserialization flaw. If the security framework has not been initialized, it may allow a remote attacker to run arbitrary shell commands when unmarshalling XML or any supported format. e.g. JSON. (regression of CVE-2013-7285)",
   id: "GHSA-hf23-9pf7-388p",
   modified: "2025-04-01T16:33:05Z",
   published: "2019-07-26T16:09:47Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-10173",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3892",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4352",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0445",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0727",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10173",
      },
      {
         type: "PACKAGE",
         url: "https://github.com/x-stream/xstream",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://x-stream.github.io/changes.html#1.4.11",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
   summary: "Deserialization of Untrusted Data and Code Injection in xstream",
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.