ghsa-hv7q-959v-864g
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:04
Modified
2022-05-13 01:04
Severity ?
Details
The Gluster file system through version 4.1.4 is vulnerable to abuse of the 'features/index' translator. A remote attacker with access to mount volumes could exploit this via the 'GF_XATTROP_ENTRY_IN_KEY' xattrop to create arbitrary, empty files on the target server.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2018-14654" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-22" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2018-10-31T19:29:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The Gluster file system through version 4.1.4 is vulnerable to abuse of the \u0027features/index\u0027 translator. A remote attacker with access to mount volumes could exploit this via the \u0027GF_XATTROP_ENTRY_IN_KEY\u0027 xattrop to create arbitrary, empty files on the target server.", "id": "GHSA-hv7q-959v-864g", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:04:42Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:04:42Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-14654" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3431" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3432" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3470" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-14654" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1631576" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-14654" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/11/msg00000.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201904-06" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.