GHSA-JR96-V85M-7XHC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-11 09:30 – Updated: 2026-04-01 18:34
VLAI
Details
Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in Adrian Tobey WordPress SMTP Service, Email Delivery Solved! — MailHawk allows PHP Local File Inclusion. This issue affects WordPress SMTP Service, Email Delivery Solved! — MailHawk: from n/a through 1.3.1.
Severity
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-31015"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-98"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-11T09:15:19Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program (\u0027PHP Remote File Inclusion\u0027) vulnerability in Adrian Tobey WordPress SMTP Service, Email Delivery Solved! \u2014 MailHawk allows PHP Local File Inclusion. This issue affects WordPress SMTP Service, Email Delivery Solved! \u2014 MailHawk: from n/a through 1.3.1.",
"id": "GHSA-jr96-v85m-7xhc",
"modified": "2026-04-01T18:34:39Z",
"published": "2025-04-11T09:30:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31015"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/mailhawk/vulnerability/wordpress-wordpress-smtp-service-email-delivery-solved-mailhawk-1-3-1-local-file-inclusion-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…