GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-MHRG-94VW-45C5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-27 06:31 – Updated: 2026-03-29 15:33
VLAI
Summary
Spring AI: Insufficient Validation causes SSRF when processing multimodal messages with user-supplied URLs
Details

Spring AI's spring-ai-bedrock-converse contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in BedrockProxyChatModel when processing multimodal messages that include user-supplied media URLs. Insufficient validation of those URLs allows an attacker to induce the server to issue HTTP requests to unintended internal or external destinations.

This issue affects Spring AI: from 1.0.0 before 1.0.5, from 1.1.0 before 1.1.4.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.springframework.ai:spring-ai-bedrock-converse"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.0.0-M5"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.0.5"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.springframework.ai:spring-ai-bedrock-converse"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "1.1.0-M1"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.1.4"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-22742"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-03-29T15:33:25Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-27T06:16:37Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Spring AI\u0027s spring-ai-bedrock-converse\u00a0contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in\u00a0BedrockProxyChatModel\u00a0when processing multimodal messages that include user-supplied media URLs. Insufficient validation of those URLs allows an attacker to induce the server to issue HTTP requests to unintended internal or external destinations.\n\nThis issue affects Spring AI: from 1.0.0 before 1.0.5, from 1.1.0 before 1.1.4.",
  "id": "GHSA-mhrg-94vw-45c5",
  "modified": "2026-03-29T15:33:25Z",
  "published": "2026-03-27T06:31:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22742"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-ai/commit/a7d3223bc11a010b93fbc40a17fa9b68c52a8118"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-ai"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-ai/releases/tag/v1.0.5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-ai/releases/tag/v1.1.4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://spring.io/security/cve-2026-22742"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Spring AI: Insufficient Validation causes SSRF when processing multimodal messages with user-supplied URLs"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…