ghsa-mr39-xfw3-r82c
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 19:04
Modified
2022-10-26 12:00
Severity ?
Details
An integer overflow leading to a heap-buffer overflow was found in the DwaCompressor of OpenEXR in versions before 3.0.1. An attacker could use this flaw to crash an application compiled with OpenEXR. This is a different flaw from CVE-2021-23215.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2021-26260", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-190", "CWE-191", "CWE-400", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2021-06-08T12:15:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "An integer overflow leading to a heap-buffer overflow was found in the DwaCompressor of OpenEXR in versions before 3.0.1. An attacker could use this flaw to crash an application compiled with OpenEXR. This is a different flaw from CVE-2021-23215.", id: "GHSA-mr39-xfw3-r82c", modified: "2022-10-26T12:00:32Z", published: "2022-05-24T19:04:22Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26260", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947582", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/07/msg00001.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/12/msg00022.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BXFLD4ZAXKAIWO6ZPBCQEEDZB5IG676K", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5299", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.