ghsa-mx4x-652m-w4fw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 16:58
Modified
2022-05-24 16:58
Details
The /usr/sbin/pinger binary packaged with squid in SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 before and including version 4.8-5.8.1 and in SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 before and including 3.5.21-26.17.1 had squid:root, 0750 permissions. This allowed an attacker that compromissed the squid user to gain persistence by changing the binary
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2019-3688", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2019-10-07T14:15:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "The /usr/sbin/pinger binary packaged with squid in SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 before and including version 4.8-5.8.1 and in SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 before and including 3.5.21-26.17.1 had squid:root, 0750 permissions. This allowed an attacker that compromissed the squid user to gain persistence by changing the binary", id: "GHSA-mx4x-652m-w4fw", modified: "2022-05-24T16:58:10Z", published: "2022-05-24T16:58:10Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-3688", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093414", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00053.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00056.html", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.