GHSA-MX5J-MP4F-G8JG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-31 19:38 – Updated: 2026-07-31 19:38Impact
Savon::Model generated SOAP operation methods by interpolating operation names into Ruby source passed to module_eval. An attacker who can control the operation names of a WSDL, can inject Ruby code that executes in the application process. This affects only the .all_operations class method provided by Savon::Model to automatically register all operations provided by the WSDL. Configuring Savon::Model with trusted operation names via .operations is safe.
Patches
Patched in Savon 2.17.2.
Users should upgrade to 2.17.2 or later.
Workarounds
Avoid .all_operations for untrusted WSDL documents. Use .operations with trusted operation names instead.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "savon"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.9.8"
},
{
"fixed": "2.17.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-53510"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-31T19:38:25Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\n`Savon::Model` generated SOAP operation methods by interpolating operation names into Ruby source passed to `module_eval`. An attacker who can control the operation names of a WSDL, can inject Ruby code that executes in the application process. This affects only the `.all_operations` class method provided by `Savon::Model` to automatically register all operations provided by the WSDL. Configuring `Savon::Model` with trusted operation names via `.operations` is safe.\n\n### Patches\n\nPatched in Savon 2.17.2.\n\nUsers should upgrade to 2.17.2 or later.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nAvoid `.all_operations` for untrusted WSDL documents. Use `.operations` with trusted operation names instead.",
"id": "GHSA-mx5j-mp4f-g8jg",
"modified": "2026-07-31T19:38:25Z",
"published": "2026-07-31T19:38:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/savonrb/savon/security/advisories/GHSA-mx5j-mp4f-g8jg"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/savonrb/savon/commit/8f22eb543e7436f6247172c9be47e22792d375e9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/savon/CVE-2026-53510.yml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/savonrb/savon"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/savonrb/savon/releases/tag/v2.17.2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord/SearchResults?query=CVE-2026-53510"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Savon::Model evaluates WSDL operation names as Ruby source"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.