ghsa-p36c-2mv6-8m8q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2023-08-03 18:30
Modified
2024-04-04 06:31
Severity ?
Details
A flaw was found in the QEMU virtual crypto device while handling data encryption/decryption requests in virtio_crypto_handle_sym_req. There is no check for the value of src_len
and dst_len
in virtio_crypto_sym_op_helper, potentially leading to a heap buffer overflow when the two values differ.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2023-3180", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-122", "CWE-787", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2023-08-03T15:15:29Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "A flaw was found in the QEMU virtual crypto device while handling data encryption/decryption requests in virtio_crypto_handle_sym_req. There is no check for the value of `src_len` and `dst_len` in virtio_crypto_sym_op_helper, potentially leading to a heap buffer overflow when the two values differ.", id: "GHSA-p36c-2mv6-8m8q", modified: "2024-04-04T06:31:44Z", published: "2023-08-03T18:30:35Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-3180", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-3180", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222424", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/10/msg00006.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MURWGXDIF2WTDXV36T6HFJDBL632AO7R", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230831-0008", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.