ghsa-phhj-vpf5-5666
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:28
Modified
2023-02-02 21:33
Severity ?
Details
A PGP signature bypass flaw was found in fwupd (all versions), which could lead to the installation of unsigned firmware. As per upstream, a signature bypass is theoretically possible, but not practical because the Linux Vendor Firmware Service (LVFS) is either not implemented or enabled in versions of fwupd shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 and 8. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality and integrity.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2020-10759" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-347" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2020-09-15T19:15:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "A PGP signature bypass flaw was found in fwupd (all versions), which could lead to the installation of unsigned firmware. As per upstream, a signature bypass is theoretically possible, but not practical because the Linux Vendor Firmware Service (LVFS) is either not implemented or enabled in versions of fwupd shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 and 8. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality and integrity.", "id": "GHSA-phhj-vpf5-5666", "modified": "2023-02-02T21:33:41Z", "published": "2022-05-24T17:28:16Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-10759" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:4436" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-10759" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844316" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/justinsteven/advisories/blob/master/2020_fwupd_dangling_s3_bucket_and_CVE-2020-10759_signature_verification_bypass.md" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.