GHSA-PR59-H9PH-3FR8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-15 20:13 – Updated: 2026-07-15 22:06
VLAI
Summary
protobufjs-cli: Code injection in pbjs static output from crafted JSON descriptor names
Details

Summary

A previous fix for unsafe name handling in pbjs static / static-module code generation was incomplete. Affected versions of protobufjs-cli could still emit unsafe JavaScript references when generating static output from crafted JSON descriptor input. The common case of parsing schemas from .proto files is not affected.

This is a bypass of GHSA-6r35-46g8-jcw9 / CVE-2026-44295.

Impact

An attacker who can provide or influence pre-parsed JSON descriptors passed to pbjs static code generation may be able to cause generated JavaScript output to contain attacker-controlled code.

The injected code may execute if the generated file is later executed or imported and an affected generated API path is invoked.

Preconditions

  • The application or build process must run pbjs static code generation on a pre-parsed JSON descriptor influenced by an attacker.
  • The generated JavaScript file must subsequently be executed or imported.
  • An affected generated API path must be invoked.

Workarounds

Do not run affected versions of pbjs static or static-module generation on untrusted JSON descriptors. If untrusted JSON descriptors must be accepted, validate descriptor-derived names before code generation and reject names that could not have been produced by parsing a valid .proto file. Running code generation in an isolated environment can reduce impact.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.3.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "protobufjs-cli"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.3.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2.4.2"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "protobufjs-cli"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "2.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2.5.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-54271"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-94"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-15T20:13:54Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-22T18:16:45Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nA previous fix for unsafe name handling in `pbjs` static / static-module code generation was incomplete. Affected versions of `protobufjs-cli` could still emit unsafe JavaScript references when generating static output from crafted JSON descriptor input. The common case of parsing schemas from `.proto` files is not affected.\n\nThis is a bypass of GHSA-6r35-46g8-jcw9 / CVE-2026-44295.\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker who can provide or influence pre-parsed JSON descriptors passed to `pbjs` static code generation may be able to cause generated JavaScript output to contain attacker-controlled code.\n\nThe injected code may execute if the generated file is later executed or imported and an affected generated API path is invoked.\n\n## Preconditions\n\n* The application or build process must run `pbjs` static code generation on a pre-parsed JSON descriptor influenced by an attacker.\n* The generated JavaScript file must subsequently be executed or imported.\n* An affected generated API path must be invoked.\n\n## Workarounds\n\nDo not run affected versions of `pbjs` static or static-module generation on untrusted JSON descriptors. If untrusted JSON descriptors must be accepted, validate descriptor-derived names before code generation and reject names that could not have been produced by parsing a valid `.proto` file. Running code generation in an isolated environment can reduce impact.",
  "id": "GHSA-pr59-h9ph-3fr8",
  "modified": "2026-07-15T22:06:57Z",
  "published": "2026-06-15T20:13:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/protobufjs/protobuf.js/security/advisories/GHSA-pr59-h9ph-3fr8"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54271"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/protobufjs/protobuf.js"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "protobufjs-cli: Code injection in pbjs static output from crafted JSON descriptor names"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…