GHSA-Q7RW-W4CQ-2J6W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-09 12:57 – Updated: 2025-04-09 12:57
VLAI?
Summary
bep/imagemeta allows excessively large EXIF data structures
Details
Impact
The EXIF data format allows for defining excessively large data structures in relatively small payloads. Before v0.10.0, If you didn't trust the input images, this could be abused to construct denial-of-service attacks.
Patches
v0.10.0 added LimitNumTags (default 5000) and LimitTagSize (default 10000) options.
Severity ?
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/bep/imagemeta"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "0.10.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-32024"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-770"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-04-09T12:57:44Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2025-04-08T16:15:27Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\nThe EXIF data format allows for defining excessively large data structures in relatively small payloads. Before `v0.10.0`, If you didn\u0027t trust the input images, this could be abused to construct denial-of-service attacks.\n\n### Patches\n`v0.10.0` added LimitNumTags (default 5000) and LimitTagSize (default 10000) options.",
"id": "GHSA-q7rw-w4cq-2j6w",
"modified": "2025-04-09T12:57:44Z",
"published": "2025-04-09T12:57:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/bep/imagemeta/security/advisories/GHSA-q7rw-w4cq-2j6w"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-32024"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/bep/imagemeta/commit/4fd89616d8bf7f9bb892360d3fb19080ec2b4602"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/bep/imagemeta"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "bep/imagemeta allows excessively large EXIF data structures"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…