ghsa-qwvg-rfmc-974p
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:59
Modified
2022-05-14 03:59
Details

The dtls1_clear_queues function in ssl/d1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h frees data structures without considering that application data can arrive between a ChangeCipherSpec message and a Finished message, which allows remote DTLS peers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via unexpected application data.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2014-8176"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2015-06-12T19:59:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The dtls1_clear_queues function in ssl/d1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h frees data structures without considering that application data can arrive between a ChangeCipherSpec message and a Finished message, which allows remote DTLS peers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via unexpected application data.",
  "id": "GHSA-qwvg-rfmc-974p",
  "modified": "2022-05-14T03:59:44Z",
  "published": "2022-05-14T03:59:44Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-8176"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/470990fee0182566d439ef7e82d1abf18b7085d7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa98"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-412672.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05184351"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content\u0026id=SB10122"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://openssl.org/news/secadv/20150611.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3286\u0026user=guest\u0026pass=guest"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201506-02"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20150611.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://fortiguard.com/advisory/openssl-vulnerabilities-june-2015"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00007.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00037.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1115.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2957.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150612-openssl"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3287"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/openssl-vulnerabilities-june-2015"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/75159"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1032564"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2639-1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.