ghsa-qxj9-r243-8955
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-04-17 12:32
Modified
2024-04-17 12:32
Severity ?
Details
A vulnerability was found in Tenda AC500 2.0.1.9(1307). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function formSetCfm of the file /goform/setcfm. The manipulation of the argument funcpara1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-261143. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-3907" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-121" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-17T11:15:12Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "A vulnerability was found in Tenda AC500 2.0.1.9(1307). It has been rated as critical. This issue affects the function formSetCfm of the file /goform/setcfm. The manipulation of the argument funcpara1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-261143. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.", "id": "GHSA-qxj9-r243-8955", "modified": "2024-04-17T12:32:05Z", "published": "2024-04-17T12:32:05Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-3907" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/abcdefg-png/IoT-vulnerable/blob/main/Tenda/AC500/formSetCfm.md" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.261143" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.261143" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.313802" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.