ghsa-rg4c-f6cj-x9w8
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:18
Modified
2022-05-13 01:18
Severity ?
Details
Curl_smtp_escape_eob in lib/smtp.c in curl 7.54.1 to and including curl 7.60.0 has a heap-based buffer overflow that might be exploitable by an attacker who can control the data that curl transmits over SMTP with certain settings (i.e., use of a nonstandard --limit-rate argument or CURLOPT_BUFFERSIZE value).
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2018-0500", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-787", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2018-07-11T13:29:00Z", severity: "CRITICAL", }, details: "Curl_smtp_escape_eob in lib/smtp.c in curl 7.54.1 to and including curl 7.60.0 has a heap-based buffer overflow that might be exploitable by an attacker who can control the data that curl transmits over SMTP with certain settings (i.e., use of a nonstandard --limit-rate argument or CURLOPT_BUFFERSIZE value).", id: "GHSA-rg4c-f6cj-x9w8", modified: "2022-05-13T01:18:24Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:18:24Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-0500", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/curl/curl/commit/ba1dbd78e5f1ed67c1b8d37ac89d90e5e330b628", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2486", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://curl.haxx.se/docs/adv_2018-70a2.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201807-04", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3710-1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041280", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.