GHSA-RQ3V-MJ3J-QV4C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-09 15:30 – Updated: 2026-08-09 15:30
VLAI
Details

A vulnerability was determined in mifi lossless-cut up to 3.69.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file src/main/httpServer.ts of the component Built-in HTTP API Service. Executing a manipulation can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack requires access to the local network. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This patch is called 260802348955231442c4bae6c2d9d8ede947af0a. It is best practice to apply a patch to resolve this issue. The project maintainer provides this view: "I'm not sure that this is a critical vulnerability, because it is behind an experimental CLI flag and the NTLM behavior isn't really a LosslessCut bug." The CVSS vector reflects the high level of pre-requisites.

Severity
3.1 (Low)
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
1.3 (Low)
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-19352"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-09T13:16:50Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "A vulnerability was determined in mifi lossless-cut up to 3.69.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file src/main/httpServer.ts of the component Built-in HTTP API Service. Executing a manipulation can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack requires access to the local network. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This patch is called 260802348955231442c4bae6c2d9d8ede947af0a. It is best practice to apply a patch to resolve this issue. The project maintainer provides this view: \"I\u0027m not sure that this is a critical vulnerability, because it is behind an experimental CLI flag and the NTLM behavior isn\u0027t really a LosslessCut bug.\" The CVSS vector reflects the high level of pre-requisites.",
  "id": "GHSA-rq3v-mj3j-qv4c",
  "modified": "2026-08-09T15:30:28Z",
  "published": "2026-08-09T15:30:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-19352"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/mifi/lossless-cut/commit/260802348955231442c4bae6c2d9d8ede947af0a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/mifi/lossless-cut"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://my.feishu.cn/file/Jq4Ib90xeod3oPxlk77cv7jPnFe"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-19352"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/submit/865910"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/387191"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/vuln/387191/cti"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.