ghsa-v25r-h4v7-62rr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-12-22 21:30
Modified
2023-01-03 21:30
Severity ?
Details
Mozilla developers and community members Julian Hector, Randell Jesup, Gabriele Svelto, Tyson Smith, Christian Holler, and Masayuki Nakano reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 94. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 95, Firefox ESR < 91.4.0, and Thunderbird < 91.4.0.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-4129" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2022-12-22T20:15:00Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "Mozilla developers and community members Julian Hector, Randell Jesup, Gabriele Svelto, Tyson Smith, Christian Holler, and Masayuki Nakano reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 94. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox \u003c 95, Firefox ESR \u003c 91.4.0, and Thunderbird \u003c 91.4.0.", "id": "GHSA-v25r-h4v7-62rr", "modified": "2023-01-03T21:30:20Z", "published": "2022-12-22T21:30:31Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-4129" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1393362%2C1736046%2C1736751%2C1737009%2C1739372%2C1739421" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2021-52" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2021-53" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2021-54" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.