Vulnerability-Lookup

GHSA-V9RJ-XJFV-XJ9R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-16 22:07 – Updated: 2026-09-16 22:07

Summary

djust: WebSocket/runtime reconstructed request omits the client Host, causing host/subdomain TenantResolvers to misresolve the tenant on the live path

Details

Impact

The WebSocket handle_mount and ViewRuntime._build_request rebuild an HttpRequest via RequestFactory().get(...) with no HTTP_HOST, so request.get_host() defaulted to "testserver" on the live path. Host/subdomain/domain TenantResolvers then misresolved the tenant — None on the live path while the HTTP path resolved correctly. With STRICT_MODE=False the tenant-scoped managers returned unscoped rows (cross-tenant disclosure); with the default they returned an empty queryset (broken tenancy).

Patches

Fixed in djust 1.0.7. The handshake Host is extracted from the ASGI scope, validated against ALLOWED_HOSTS (the same logic as the CSWSH Origin gate, parsed with Django's split_domain_port so malformed Hosts are rejected at the boundary), and propagated — with the TLS scheme — into the reconstructed request, so live-path tenant resolution matches HTTP exactly.

Workarounds

No workaround on the live path short of upgrading. Most exposed when combined with STRICT_MODE=False.

Severity

6.3 (Medium)


                  
                    CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "djust"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.0.7"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-61589"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-348",
      "CWE-639"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-16T22:07:52Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nThe WebSocket `handle_mount` and `ViewRuntime._build_request` rebuild an `HttpRequest` via `RequestFactory().get(...)` with no `HTTP_HOST`, so `request.get_host()` defaulted to `\"testserver\"` on the live path. Host/subdomain/domain `TenantResolver`s then misresolved the tenant \u2014 `None` on the live path while the HTTP path resolved correctly. With `STRICT_MODE=False` the tenant-scoped managers returned unscoped rows (**cross-tenant disclosure**); with the default they returned an empty queryset (broken tenancy).\n\n### Patches\nFixed in **djust 1.0.7**. The handshake Host is extracted from the ASGI scope, validated against `ALLOWED_HOSTS` (the same logic as the CSWSH Origin gate, parsed with Django\u0027s `split_domain_port` so malformed Hosts are rejected at the boundary), and propagated \u2014 with the TLS scheme \u2014 into the reconstructed request, so live-path tenant resolution matches HTTP exactly.\n\n### Workarounds\nNo workaround on the live path short of upgrading. Most exposed when combined with `STRICT_MODE=False`.",
  "id": "GHSA-v9rj-xjfv-xj9r",
  "modified": "2026-09-16T22:07:52Z",
  "published": "2026-09-16T22:07:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/djust-org/djust/security/advisories/GHSA-v9rj-xjfv-xj9r"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/djust-org/djust"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/djust-org/djust/releases/tag/v1.0.7"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "djust: WebSocket/runtime reconstructed request omits the client Host, causing host/subdomain TenantResolvers to misresolve the tenant on the live path"
}

CVE-2026-61589 (GCVE-0-2026-61589)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-16 22:08 – Updated: 2026-09-17 19:23

Title

djust: WebSocket/runtime reconstructed request omits the client Host, causing host/subdomain TenantResolvers to misresolve the tenant on the live path

Summary

djust provides Phoenix LiveView-style reactive server-side rendering for Django with Rust-powered performance. Prior to version 1.0.7, the WebSocket `handle_mount` and `ViewRuntime._build_request` rebuild an `HttpRequest` via `RequestFactory().get(...)` with no `HTTP_HOST`, so `request.get_host()` defaulted to `"testserver"` on the live path. Host/subdomain/domain `TenantResolver`s then misresolved the tenant — `None` on the live path while the HTTP path resolved correctly. With `STRICT_MODE=False` the tenant-scoped managers returned unscoped rows (cross-tenant disclosure); with the default they returned an empty queryset (broken tenancy). This is fixed in djust 1.0.7. The handshake Host is extracted from the ASGI scope, validated against `ALLOWED_HOSTS` (the same logic as the CSWSH Origin gate, parsed with Django's `split_domain_port` so malformed Hosts are rejected at the boundary), and propagated — with the TLS scheme — into the reconstructed request, so live-path tenant resolution matches HTTP exactly. There is no known workaround on the live path short of upgrading. Users are most exposed when combined with `STRICT_MODE=False`.

Severity

6.3 (Medium)


                        
                          CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

SSVC

Exploitation: none Automatable: no Technical Impact: partial

CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)

Decision recorded 2026-09-17 17:10 UTC

CWE

CWE-348 - Use of Less Trusted Source
CWE-639 - Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

Assigner

GitHub_M mitre root Scorecard

References

2 references

URL	Tags
https://github.com/djust-org/djust/security/advis…	x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://github.com/djust-org/djust/releases/tag/v1.0.7	x_refsource_MISC

Impacted products

1 product

Vendor	Product	Version
djust-org	djust	Affected: < 1.0.7

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-61589",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-09-17T17:10:32.427871Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-09-17T19:23:05.705Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "djust",
          "vendor": "djust-org",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 1.0.7"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "djust provides Phoenix LiveView-style reactive server-side rendering for Django with Rust-powered performance. Prior to version 1.0.7, the WebSocket `handle_mount` and `ViewRuntime._build_request` rebuild an `HttpRequest` via `RequestFactory().get(...)` with no `HTTP_HOST`, so `request.get_host()` defaulted to `\"testserver\"` on the live path. Host/subdomain/domain `TenantResolver`s then misresolved the tenant \u2014 `None` on the live path while the HTTP path resolved correctly. With `STRICT_MODE=False` the tenant-scoped managers returned unscoped rows (cross-tenant disclosure); with the default they returned an empty queryset (broken tenancy). This is fixed in djust 1.0.7. The handshake Host is extracted from the ASGI scope, validated against `ALLOWED_HOSTS` (the same logic as the CSWSH Origin gate, parsed with Django\u0027s `split_domain_port` so malformed Hosts are rejected at the boundary), and propagated \u2014 with the TLS scheme \u2014 into the reconstructed request, so live-path tenant resolution matches HTTP exactly. There is no known workaround on the live path short of upgrading. Users are most exposed when combined with `STRICT_MODE=False`."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 6.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "CHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-348",
              "description": "CWE-348: Use of Less Trusted Source",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-639",
              "description": "CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-09-16T22:08:52.415Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/djust-org/djust/security/advisories/GHSA-v9rj-xjfv-xj9r",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/djust-org/djust/security/advisories/GHSA-v9rj-xjfv-xj9r"
        },
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/djust-org/djust/releases/tag/v1.0.7",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/djust-org/djust/releases/tag/v1.0.7"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-v9rj-xjfv-xj9r",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "djust: WebSocket/runtime reconstructed request omits the client Host, causing host/subdomain TenantResolvers to misresolve the tenant on the live path"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-61589",
    "datePublished": "2026-09-16T22:08:52.415Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-07-10T17:12:17.237Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-09-17T19:23:05.705Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.

Action not permitted