ghsa-vmp4-486w-93fw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:54
Modified
2022-05-14 03:54
Details

PDFium in Google Chrome prior to 57.0.2987.98 for Windows could be made to increment off the end of a buffer, which allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted PDF file.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2017-5032",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-787",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2017-04-24T23:59:00Z",
      severity: "HIGH",
   },
   details: "PDFium in Google Chrome prior to 57.0.2987.98 for Windows could be made to increment off the end of a buffer, which allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted PDF file.",
   id: "GHSA-vmp4-486w-93fw",
   modified: "2022-05-14T03:54:07Z",
   published: "2022-05-14T03:54:07Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-5032",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2017/03/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://crbug.com/668724",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201704-02",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0499.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3810",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96767",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.