ghsa-vppj-q42f-96w5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-19 00:00
Modified
2022-05-27 00:01
Details

Stack-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2022-1771",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-674",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2022-05-18T20:15:00Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "Stack-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 8.2.",
   id: "GHSA-vppj-q42f-96w5",
   modified: "2022-05-27T00:01:12Z",
   published: "2022-05-19T00:00:14Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1771",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/51f0bfb88a3554ca2dde777d78a59880d1ee37a8",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://huntr.dev/bounties/faa74175-5317-4b71-a363-dfc39094ecbb",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-32",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202305-16",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.