GHSA-W5R6-MCGQ-7PQ4
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-27 00:04 – Updated: 2026-05-27 00:04Summary
The authentication endpoint POST /auth/token in yamcs-core lacks any form of rate limiting, account lockout, or failed attempt throttling. As a result, an unauthenticated remote attacker can perform unlimited password guessing attempts against any user account.
This missing rate limiting vulnerability (CWE-307) significantly increases the risk of successful brute-force attacks.
Root Cause
File: yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/http/auth/AuthHandler.java
POST /auth/token has no rate limiting, no lockout after failed attempts, and no CAPTCHA. The handler processes unlimited authentication requests without any throttling mechanism:
// AuthHandler.java — handleToken()
// No throttle, no failed attempt counter, no lockout
private void handleToken(HandlerContext ctx) {
...
getSecurityStore().login(token).whenComplete((info, err) -> {
// Directly attempts authentication with no rate check
});
}
This is absent by default — the official quickstart and documentation contain no guidance on configuring rate limiting.
Impact
An attacker can make unlimited authentication attempts against any account. This enables efficient brute-force attacks against any account.
Proof of Concept
# 20 attempts — zero rate limiting
for i in $(seq 1 20); do
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "Attempt $i: HTTP %{http_code}\n" \
-X POST "http://TARGET:8090/auth/token" \
-d "grant_type=password&username=operator&password=operator12$i"
done
# All return HTTP 401 — no HTTP 429 ever
Confirmed: 20 attempts in 0.07 seconds, no rate limiting enforced.
Fix
Implement DRF-style throttling on /auth/token:
// Track failed attempts per IP
private static final Cache<String, Integer> FAILED_ATTEMPTS =
CacheBuilder.newBuilder().expireAfterWrite(15, TimeUnit.MINUTES).build();
private static final int MAX_ATTEMPTS = 10;
private void handleToken(HandlerContext ctx) {
String ip = ctx.getRemoteAddress();
int attempts = Optional.ofNullable(FAILED_ATTEMPTS.getIfPresent(ip)).orElse(0);
if (attempts >= MAX_ATTEMPTS) {
throw new TooManyRequestsException("Rate limit exceeded");
}
// ... existing auth logic
// On failure: FAILED_ATTEMPTS.put(ip, attempts + 1)
}
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.yamcs:yamcs-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "5.12.7"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-44596"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-307"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-27T00:04:28Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\n\nThe authentication endpoint `POST /auth/token` in `yamcs-core` lacks any form of rate limiting, account lockout, or failed attempt throttling. As a result, an unauthenticated remote attacker can perform unlimited password guessing attempts against any user account.\n\nThis missing rate limiting vulnerability (CWE-307) significantly increases the risk of successful brute-force attacks.\n\n### Root Cause\n\n**File:** `yamcs-core/src/main/java/org/yamcs/http/auth/AuthHandler.java`\n\n`POST /auth/token` has no rate limiting, no lockout after failed attempts, and no CAPTCHA. The handler processes unlimited authentication requests without any throttling mechanism:\n\n```java\n// AuthHandler.java \u2014 handleToken()\n// No throttle, no failed attempt counter, no lockout\nprivate void handleToken(HandlerContext ctx) {\n ...\n getSecurityStore().login(token).whenComplete((info, err) -\u003e {\n // Directly attempts authentication with no rate check\n });\n}\n```\n\nThis is absent by default \u2014 the official quickstart and documentation contain no guidance on configuring rate limiting.\n\n### Impact\n\nAn attacker can make unlimited authentication attempts against any account. This enables efficient brute-force attacks against any account.\n\n### Proof of Concept\n\n```bash\n# 20 attempts \u2014 zero rate limiting\nfor i in $(seq 1 20); do\n curl -s -o /dev/null -w \"Attempt $i: HTTP %{http_code}\\n\" \\\n -X POST \"http://TARGET:8090/auth/token\" \\\n -d \"grant_type=password\u0026username=operator\u0026password=operator12$i\"\ndone\n# All return HTTP 401 \u2014 no HTTP 429 ever\n```\n\n**Confirmed:** 20 attempts in 0.07 seconds, no rate limiting enforced.\n\n### Fix\n\nImplement DRF-style throttling on `/auth/token`:\n\n```java\n// Track failed attempts per IP\nprivate static final Cache\u003cString, Integer\u003e FAILED_ATTEMPTS =\n CacheBuilder.newBuilder().expireAfterWrite(15, TimeUnit.MINUTES).build();\n\nprivate static final int MAX_ATTEMPTS = 10;\n\nprivate void handleToken(HandlerContext ctx) {\n String ip = ctx.getRemoteAddress();\n int attempts = Optional.ofNullable(FAILED_ATTEMPTS.getIfPresent(ip)).orElse(0);\n if (attempts \u003e= MAX_ATTEMPTS) {\n throw new TooManyRequestsException(\"Rate limit exceeded\");\n }\n // ... existing auth logic\n // On failure: FAILED_ATTEMPTS.put(ip, attempts + 1)\n}\n```",
"id": "GHSA-w5r6-mcgq-7pq4",
"modified": "2026-05-27T00:04:28Z",
"published": "2026-05-27T00:04:28Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/yamcs/yamcs/security/advisories/GHSA-w5r6-mcgq-7pq4"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/yamcs/yamcs"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Yamcs has No Rate Limiting on Authentication Endpoint"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.