ghsa-wfcg-xg9m-fp2f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:40
Modified
2022-05-24 17:40
Details
In Eclipse Californium version 2.3.0 to 2.6.0, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally fails, because it sticks to a wrong internal state. That wrong internal state is set by a previous certificate based DTLS handshakes failure with TLS parameter mismatch. The server must be restarted to recover this. This allow clients to force a DoS.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2020-27222", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2021-02-03T16:15:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "In Eclipse Californium version 2.3.0 to 2.6.0, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally fails, because it sticks to a wrong internal state. That wrong internal state is set by a previous certificate based DTLS handshakes failure with TLS parameter mismatch. The server must be restarted to recover this. This allow clients to force a DoS.", id: "GHSA-wfcg-xg9m-fp2f", modified: "2022-05-24T17:40:47Z", published: "2022-05-24T17:40:47Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-27222", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=570844", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.