cve-2020-27222
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2021-02-03 15:45
Modified
2024-08-04 16:11
Severity ?
Summary
In Eclipse Californium version 2.3.0 to 2.6.0, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally fails, because the DTLS server side sticks to a wrong internal state. That wrong internal state is set by a previous certificate based DTLS handshake failure with TLS parameter mismatch. The DTLS server side must be restarted to recover this. This allow clients to force a DoS.
References
emo@eclipse.orghttps://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=570844Permissions Required, Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
The Eclipse FoundationEclipse Californium
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T16:11:36.000Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=570844"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "Eclipse Californium",
          "vendor": "The Eclipse Foundation",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "[2.3.0, 2.6.0]"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "In Eclipse Californium version 2.3.0 to 2.6.0, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally fails, because the DTLS server side sticks to a wrong internal state. That wrong internal state is set by a previous certificate based DTLS handshake failure with TLS parameter mismatch. The DTLS server side must be restarted to recover this. This allow clients to force a DoS."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-372",
              "description": "CWE-372: Incomplete Internal State Distinction",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2021-02-03T16:36:38",
        "orgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
        "shortName": "eclipse"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=570844"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "security@eclipse.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2020-27222",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "Eclipse Californium",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "[2.3.0, 2.6.0]"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "The Eclipse Foundation"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "In Eclipse Californium version 2.3.0 to 2.6.0, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally fails, because the DTLS server side sticks to a wrong internal state. That wrong internal state is set by a previous certificate based DTLS handshake failure with TLS parameter mismatch. The DTLS server side must be restarted to recover this. This allow clients to force a DoS."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "CWE-372: Incomplete Internal State Distinction"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=570844",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=570844"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
    "assignerShortName": "eclipse",
    "cveId": "CVE-2020-27222",
    "datePublished": "2021-02-03T15:45:13",
    "dateReserved": "2020-10-19T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T16:11:36.000Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2020-27222\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"published\":\"2021-02-03T16:15:13.117\",\"lastModified\":\"2021-02-09T15:21:45.077\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In Eclipse Californium version 2.3.0 to 2.6.0, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally fails, because the DTLS server side sticks to a wrong internal state. That wrong internal state is set by a previous certificate based DTLS handshake failure with TLS parameter mismatch. The DTLS server side must be restarted to recover this. This allow clients to force a DoS.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En Eclipse Californium versiones 2.3.0 hasta 2.6.0, los protocolos de enlace DTLS basados ??en certificados (x509 y RPK) cometen un fallo accidentalmente, porque el lado del servidor DTLS se adhiere a un estado interno equivocado.\u0026#xa0;Ese estado interno equivocado es ajustado por medio de un fallo de protocolo de enlace DTLS basada en un certificado anterior con una falta de coincidencia de los par\u00e1metros TLS.\u0026#xa0;El lado del servidor DTLS debe reiniciarse para recuperar esto.\u0026#xa0;Esto permite a clientes forzar una DoS\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\",\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"baseScore\":5.0},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-Other\"}]},{\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-372\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:californium:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"2.3.0\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"2.6.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"56884583-F1FF-412F-B5E6-0AD0F904F260\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=570844\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"tags\":[\"Permissions Required\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.