ghsa-wvrh-73qw-9vj9
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:12
Modified
2022-05-17 01:12
Details
Heap-based buffer overflow in the process_copy_in function in GNU Cpio 2.11 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a large block value in a cpio archive.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2014-9112" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2014-12-02T16:59:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the process_copy_in function in GNU Cpio 2.11 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a large block value in a cpio archive.", "id": "GHSA-wvrh-73qw-9vj9", "modified": "2022-05-17T01:12:21Z", "published": "2022-05-17T01:12:21Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-9112" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/98918" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43709" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Nov/74" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/60167" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/62145" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3111" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/23/2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/25/2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/26/20" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71248" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2456-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.