CVE-2014-9112 (GCVE-0-2014-9112)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2014-12-02 16:00 – Updated: 2024-08-06 13:33
VLAI?
Summary
Heap-based buffer overflow in the process_copy_in function in GNU Cpio 2.11 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a large block value in a cpio archive.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
References
http://secunia.com/advisories/62145 third-party-advisoryx_refsource_SECUNIA
http://secunia.com/advisories/60167 third-party-advisoryx_refsource_SECUNIA
https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilit… vdb-entryx_refsource_XF
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71248 vdb-entryx_refsource_BID
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Nov/74 mailing-listx_refsource_FULLDISC
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security… x_refsource_CONFIRM
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43709 x_refsource_MISC
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/25/2 mailing-listx_refsource_MLIST
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/1… mailing-listx_refsource_MLIST
http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2456-1 vendor-advisoryx_refsource_UBUNTU
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/23/2 mailing-listx_refsource_MLIST
http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3111 vendor-advisoryx_refsource_DEBIAN
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T13:33:13.652Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "62145",
            "tags": [
              "third-party-advisory",
              "x_refsource_SECUNIA",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/62145"
          },
          {
            "name": "60167",
            "tags": [
              "third-party-advisory",
              "x_refsource_SECUNIA",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/60167"
          },
          {
            "name": "linux-kernel-lesspipe-code-exec(98918)",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_XF",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/98918"
          },
          {
            "name": "71248",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71248"
          },
          {
            "name": "20141123 on Linux, \u0027less\u0027 can probably get you owned",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_FULLDISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Nov/74"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43709"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20141125 CVE request: cpio heap-based buffer overflow [was Re: so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument)]",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/25/2"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20141126 CVE request: cpio heap-based buffer overflow [was Re: so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument)]",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/26/20"
          },
          {
            "name": "USN-2456-1",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_UBUNTU",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2456-1"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20141123 so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument)",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/23/2"
          },
          {
            "name": "DSA-3111",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_DEBIAN",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3111"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2014-11-23T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the process_copy_in function in GNU Cpio 2.11 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a large block value in a cpio archive."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-09-07T15:57:01",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "62145",
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory",
            "x_refsource_SECUNIA"
          ],
          "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/62145"
        },
        {
          "name": "60167",
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory",
            "x_refsource_SECUNIA"
          ],
          "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/60167"
        },
        {
          "name": "linux-kernel-lesspipe-code-exec(98918)",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_XF"
          ],
          "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/98918"
        },
        {
          "name": "71248",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71248"
        },
        {
          "name": "20141123 on Linux, \u0027less\u0027 can probably get you owned",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_FULLDISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Nov/74"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43709"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20141125 CVE request: cpio heap-based buffer overflow [was Re: so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument)]",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/25/2"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20141126 CVE request: cpio heap-based buffer overflow [was Re: so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument)]",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/26/20"
        },
        {
          "name": "USN-2456-1",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_UBUNTU"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2456-1"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20141123 so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument)",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/23/2"
        },
        {
          "name": "DSA-3111",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_DEBIAN"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3111"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2014-9112",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "Heap-based buffer overflow in the process_copy_in function in GNU Cpio 2.11 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a large block value in a cpio archive."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "62145",
              "refsource": "SECUNIA",
              "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/62145"
            },
            {
              "name": "60167",
              "refsource": "SECUNIA",
              "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/60167"
            },
            {
              "name": "linux-kernel-lesspipe-code-exec(98918)",
              "refsource": "XF",
              "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/98918"
            },
            {
              "name": "71248",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71248"
            },
            {
              "name": "20141123 on Linux, \u0027less\u0027 can probably get you owned",
              "refsource": "FULLDISC",
              "url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Nov/74"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43709",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43709"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20141125 CVE request: cpio heap-based buffer overflow [was Re: so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument)]",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/25/2"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20141126 CVE request: cpio heap-based buffer overflow [was Re: so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument)]",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/26/20"
            },
            {
              "name": "USN-2456-1",
              "refsource": "UBUNTU",
              "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2456-1"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20141123 so, can we do something about lesspipe? (+ a cpio bug to back up the argument)",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/23/2"
            },
            {
              "name": "DSA-3111",
              "refsource": "DEBIAN",
              "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3111"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2014-9112",
    "datePublished": "2014-12-02T16:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2014-11-26T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T13:33:13.652Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:gnu:cpio:2.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"D68C6D55-2BC4-4F00-B5EF-203DE849AD60\"}]}]}, {\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"16F59A04-14CF-49E2-9973-645477EA09DA\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Heap-based buffer overflow in the process_copy_in function in GNU Cpio 2.11 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a large block value in a cpio archive.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Desbordamiento de buffer basado en memoria din\\u00e1mica en la funci\\u00f3n process_copy_in en GNU Cpio 2.11 permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegaci\\u00f3n de servicio a trav\\u00e9s de un valor de bloque grande en un archivo cpio.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2014-9112",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T02:20:13.950",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\", \"baseScore\": 5.0, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2014-12-02T16:59:05.760",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Nov/74\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://secunia.com/advisories/60167\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://secunia.com/advisories/62145\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3111\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/23/2\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/25/2\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/26/20\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71248\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2456-1\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/98918\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43709\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Issue Tracking\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Nov/74\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://secunia.com/advisories/60167\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://secunia.com/advisories/62145\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3111\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/23/2\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/25/2\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/26/20\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71248\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\", \"VDB Entry\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2456-1\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/98918\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43709\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Issue Tracking\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-119\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2014-9112\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2014-12-02T16:59:05.760\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-04-12T10:46:40.837\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Heap-based buffer overflow in the process_copy_in function in GNU Cpio 2.11 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a large block value in a cpio archive.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Desbordamiento de buffer basado en memoria din\u00e1mica en la funci\u00f3n process_copy_in en GNU Cpio 2.11 permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio a trav\u00e9s de un valor de bloque grande en un archivo cpio.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-119\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:gnu:cpio:2.11:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"D68C6D55-2BC4-4F00-B5EF-203DE849AD60\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"16F59A04-14CF-49E2-9973-645477EA09DA\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Nov/74\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/60167\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/62145\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3111\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/23/2\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/25/2\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/26/20\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71248\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2456-1\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/98918\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43709\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Issue Tracking\"]},{\"url\":\"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Nov/74\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/60167\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://secunia.com/advisories/62145\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3111\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/23/2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/25/2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/26/20\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2015-2719645.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71248\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2456-1\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/98918\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?43709\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Issue Tracking\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.