github - ghsa-xqwp-g97m-cxpr

ghsa-xqwp-g97m-cxpr

Vulnerability from github

Published

2022-05-24 17:28

Modified

2024-04-04 03:03

Severity ?

5.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Details

The issue appears to be that JBoss EAP 6.4.21 does not parse the field-name in accordance to RFC7230[1] as it returns a 200 instead of a 400.

Show details on source website

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-1710"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-09-16T15:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The issue appears to be that JBoss EAP 6.4.21 does not parse the field-name in accordance to RFC7230[1] as it returns a 200 instead of a 400.",
  "id": "GHSA-xqwp-g97m-cxpr",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T03:03:14Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:28:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-1710"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

cve-2020-1710

Vulnerability from cvelistv5

Published

2020-09-16 14:28

Modified

2024-08-04 06:46

Severity ?

Summary

The issue appears to be that JBoss EAP 6.4.21 does not parse the field-name in accordance to RFC7230[1] as it returns a 200 instead of a 400.

References

▼	URL	Tags
	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970	x_refsource_MISC

Impacted products

▼	Vendor	Product
	n/a	JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

Show details on NVD website

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T06:46:30.214Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "JBoss Enterprise Application Platform",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "EAP 6.4.21"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The issue appears to be that JBoss EAP 6.4.21 does not parse the field-name in accordance to RFC7230[1] as it returns a 200 instead of a 400."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2020-09-16T14:28:20",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2020-1710",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "JBoss Enterprise Application Platform",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "EAP 6.4.21"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "The issue appears to be that JBoss EAP 6.4.21 does not parse the field-name in accordance to RFC7230[1] as it returns a 200 instead of a 400."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2020-1710",
    "datePublished": "2020-09-16T14:28:20",
    "dateReserved": "2019-11-27T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T06:46:30.214Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Tags

Taxonomy of the tags.

All sightings related to this event Export sightings related to this event

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.