GSD-2017-7658
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21Details
In Eclipse Jetty Server, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all non HTTP/1.x configurations), and 9.4.x (all HTTP/1.x configurations), when presented with two content-lengths headers, Jetty ignored the second. When presented with a content-length and a chunked encoding header, the content-length was ignored (as per RFC 2616). If an intermediary decided on the shorter length, but still passed on the longer body, then body content could be interpreted by Jetty as a pipelined request. If the intermediary was imposing authorization, the fake pipelined request would bypass that authorization.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2017-7658",
"description": "In Eclipse Jetty Server, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all non HTTP/1.x configurations), and 9.4.x (all HTTP/1.x configurations), when presented with two content-lengths headers, Jetty ignored the second. When presented with a content-length and a chunked encoding header, the content-length was ignored (as per RFC 2616). If an intermediary decided on the shorter length, but still passed on the longer body, then body content could be interpreted by Jetty as a pipelined request. If the intermediary was imposing authorization, the fake pipelined request would bypass that authorization.",
"id": "GSD-2017-7658",
"references": [
"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-7658.html",
"https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4278",
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:3779"
]
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-7658"
],
"details": "In Eclipse Jetty Server, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all non HTTP/1.x configurations), and 9.4.x (all HTTP/1.x configurations), when presented with two content-lengths headers, Jetty ignored the second. When presented with a content-length and a chunked encoding header, the content-length was ignored (as per RFC 2616). If an intermediary decided on the shorter length, but still passed on the longer body, then body content could be interpreted by Jetty as a pipelined request. If the intermediary was imposing authorization, the fake pipelined request would bypass that authorization.",
"id": "GSD-2017-7658",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:06.591741Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security@eclipse.org",
"ID": "CVE-2017-7658",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Eclipse Jetty",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_value": "9.2.25"
},
{
"version_affected": "\u003e=",
"version_value": "9.3.0"
},
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_value": "9.3.24"
},
{
"version_affected": "\u003e=",
"version_value": "9.4.0"
},
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_value": "9.4.11"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "The Eclipse Foundation"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "In Eclipse Jetty Server, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all non HTTP/1.x configurations), and 9.4.x (all HTTP/1.x configurations), when presented with two content-lengths headers, Jetty ignored the second. When presented with a content-length and a chunked encoding header, the content-length was ignored (as per RFC 2616). If an intermediary decided on the shorter length, but still passed on the longer body, then body content could be interpreted by Jetty as a pipelined request. If the intermediary was imposing authorization, the fake pipelined request would bypass that authorization."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests (\u0027HTTP Request Smuggling\u0027)"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "DSA-4278",
"refsource": "DEBIAN",
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4278"
},
{
"name": "1041194",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194"
},
{
"name": "106566",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106566"
},
{
"name": "[lucene-solr-user] 20190104 Re: SOLR v7 Security Issues Caused Denial of Use - Sonatype Application Composition Report",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/708d94141126eac03011144a971a6411fcac16d9c248d1d535a39451@%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"name": "[activemq-issues] 20190820 [jira] [Created] (AMQ-7279) Security Vulnerabilities in Libraries - jackson-databind-2.9.8.jar, tomcat-servlet-api-8.0.53.jar, tomcat-websocket-api-8.0.53.jar, zookeeper-3.4.6.jar, guava-18.0.jar, jetty-all-9.2.26.v20180806.jar, scala-library-2.11.0.jar",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053d9ce4d579b02203db18545fee5e33f35f2932885459b74d1e4272@%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"name": "[druid-commits] 20191115 [GitHub] [incubator-druid] ccaominh opened a new pull request #8878: Address security vulnerabilities",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9317fd092b257a0815434b116a8af8daea6e920b6673f4fd5583d5fe@%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"name": "https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2019-5072801.html",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2019-5072801.html"
},
{
"name": "https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2019-5072832.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2019-5072832.html"
},
{
"name": "[bookkeeper-issues] 20200729 [GitHub] [bookkeeper] padma81 opened a new issue #2387: Security vulnerabilities in the apache/bookkeeper-4.9.2 image",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1b103833cb5bc8466e24ff0ecc5e75b45a705334ab6a444e64e840a0@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"name": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html"
},
{
"name": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20181014-0001/",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20181014-0001/"
},
{
"name": "https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US\u0026docId=emr_na-hpesbst03953en_us",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US\u0026docId=emr_na-hpesbst03953en_us"
},
{
"name": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535669",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535669"
},
{
"name": "[druid-commits] 20210226 [GitHub] [druid] kingnj opened a new issue #10926: Hello, are there any plans to fix the CVE-2017-7657 and CVE-2017-7658 vulnerabilities of Jetty",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra6f956ed4ec2855583b2d0c8b4802b450f593d37b77509b48cd5d574@%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"name": "[druid-commits] 20210304 [GitHub] [druid] suneet-s commented on issue #10926: Hello, are there any plans to fix the CVE-2017-7657 and CVE-2017-7658 vulnerabilities of Jetty",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r41af10c4adec8d34a969abeb07fd0d6ad0c86768b751464f1cdd23e8@%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"name": "[druid-commits] 20210304 [GitHub] [druid] suneet-s closed issue #10926: Hello, are there any plans to fix the CVE-2017-7657 and CVE-2017-7658 vulnerabilities of Jetty",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9159c9e7ec9eac1613da2dbaddbc15691a13d4dbb2c8be974f42e6ae@%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"name": "https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html"
}
]
}
},
"gitlab.com": {
"advisories": [
{
"affected_range": "(,9.2.26],[9.3.0,9.3.24),[9.4.0,9.4.11)",
"affected_versions": "All versions up to 9.2.26, all versions starting from 9.3.0 before 9.3.24, all versions starting from 9.4.0 before 9.4.11",
"cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-1035",
"CWE-444",
"CWE-937"
],
"date": "2019-10-03",
"description": "If an intermediary decided on the shorter length, but still passed on the longer body, then body content could be interpreted by Jetty as a pipelined request. If the intermediary was imposing authorization, the fake pipelined request would bypass that authorization.",
"fixed_versions": [
"9.2.26.v20180806",
"9.3.24.v20180605",
"9.4.11.v20180605"
],
"identifier": "CVE-2017-7658",
"identifiers": [
"CVE-2017-7658"
],
"not_impacted": "All versions after 9.2.26 before 9.3.0, all versions starting from 9.3.24 before 9.4.0, all versions starting from 9.4.11",
"package_slug": "maven/org.eclipse.jetty/jetty-server",
"pubdate": "2018-06-26",
"solution": "Upgrade to versions 9.2.26.v20180806, 9.3.24.v20180605, 9.4.11.v20180605 or above.",
"title": "Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests (HTTP Request Smuggling)",
"urls": [
"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-7658",
"http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194"
],
"uuid": "0d19f715-9da2-4cf6-b020-1b5fd283fb2a"
}
]
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:jetty:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndExcluding": "9.4.11",
"versionStartIncluding": "9.4.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:jetty:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndExcluding": "9.3.24",
"versionStartIncluding": "9.3.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:jetty:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndIncluding": "9.2.26",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:oracle:rest_data_services:11.2.0.4:*:*:*:-:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:oracle:rest_data_services:12.1.0.2:*:*:*:-:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:oracle:rest_data_services:12.2.0.1:*:*:*:-:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:oracle:rest_data_services:18c:*:*:*:-:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:oracle:retail_xstore_payment:3.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:oracle:retail_xstore_point_of_service:7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:oracle:retail_xstore_point_of_service:15.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:oracle:retail_xstore_point_of_service:16.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:oracle:retail_xstore_point_of_service:17.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"children": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:hp:xp_p9000_command_view:*:*:*:*:advanced:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndIncluding": "8.6.2-00",
"versionStartIncluding": "8.4.0-00",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
},
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:h:hp:xp_p9000:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": false
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"cpe_match": [],
"operator": "AND"
},
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:e-series_santricity_management:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:e-series_santricity_os_controller:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndIncluding": "11.50.1",
"versionStartIncluding": "11.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:e-series_santricity_web_services:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:hci_management_node:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:hci_storage_node:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:oncommand_system_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndIncluding": "3.1.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "3.0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:oncommand_unified_manager_for_7-mode:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:santricity_cloud_connector:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snap_creator_framework:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapcenter:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapmanager:-:*:*:*:*:oracle:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:snapmanager:-:*:*:*:*:sap:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:solidfire:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:netapp:storage_services_connector:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security@eclipse.org",
"ID": "CVE-2017-7658"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In Eclipse Jetty Server, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all non HTTP/1.x configurations), and 9.4.x (all HTTP/1.x configurations), when presented with two content-lengths headers, Jetty ignored the second. When presented with a content-length and a chunked encoding header, the content-length was ignored (as per RFC 2616). If an intermediary decided on the shorter length, but still passed on the longer body, then body content could be interpreted by Jetty as a pipelined request. If the intermediary was imposing authorization, the fake pipelined request would bypass that authorization."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-444"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535669",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535669"
},
{
"name": "1041194",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194"
},
{
"name": "DSA-4278",
"refsource": "DEBIAN",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4278"
},
{
"name": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20181014-0001/",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20181014-0001/"
},
{
"name": "106566",
"refsource": "BID",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106566"
},
{
"name": "https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2019-5072801.html",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2019-5072801.html"
},
{
"name": "[activemq-issues] 20190820 [jira] [Created] (AMQ-7279) Security Vulnerabilities in Libraries - jackson-databind-2.9.8.jar, tomcat-servlet-api-8.0.53.jar, tomcat-websocket-api-8.0.53.jar, zookeeper-3.4.6.jar, guava-18.0.jar, jetty-all-9.2.26.v20180806.jar, scala-library-2.11.0.jar",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053d9ce4d579b02203db18545fee5e33f35f2932885459b74d1e4272@%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"name": "https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US\u0026docId=emr_na-hpesbst03953en_us",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US\u0026docId=emr_na-hpesbst03953en_us"
},
{
"name": "https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2019-5072832.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2019-5072832.html"
},
{
"name": "[lucene-solr-user] 20190104 Re: SOLR v7 Security Issues Caused Denial of Use - Sonatype Application Composition Report",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/708d94141126eac03011144a971a6411fcac16d9c248d1d535a39451@%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"name": "[druid-commits] 20191115 [GitHub] [incubator-druid] ccaominh opened a new pull request #8878: Address security vulnerabilities",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9317fd092b257a0815434b116a8af8daea6e920b6673f4fd5583d5fe@%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"name": "[bookkeeper-issues] 20200729 [GitHub] [bookkeeper] padma81 opened a new issue #2387: Security vulnerabilities in the apache/bookkeeper-4.9.2 image",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1b103833cb5bc8466e24ff0ecc5e75b45a705334ab6a444e64e840a0@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"name": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html"
},
{
"name": "[druid-commits] 20210226 [GitHub] [druid] kingnj opened a new issue #10926: Hello, are there any plans to fix the CVE-2017-7657 and CVE-2017-7658 vulnerabilities of Jetty",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra6f956ed4ec2855583b2d0c8b4802b450f593d37b77509b48cd5d574@%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"name": "[druid-commits] 20210304 [GitHub] [druid] suneet-s closed issue #10926: Hello, are there any plans to fix the CVE-2017-7657 and CVE-2017-7658 vulnerabilities of Jetty",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r9159c9e7ec9eac1613da2dbaddbc15691a13d4dbb2c8be974f42e6ae@%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"name": "[druid-commits] 20210304 [GitHub] [druid] suneet-s commented on issue #10926: Hello, are there any plans to fix the CVE-2017-7657 and CVE-2017-7658 vulnerabilities of Jetty",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r41af10c4adec8d34a969abeb07fd0d6ad0c86768b751464f1cdd23e8@%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E"
},
{
"name": "N/A",
"refsource": "N/A",
"tags": [],
"url": "https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 6.4,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "HIGH",
"userInteractionRequired": false
},
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.9
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2021-07-20T23:15Z",
"publishedDate": "2018-06-26T17:29Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.