GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GSD-2020-7671

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2021-05-24 00:00
Details
goliath through 1.0.6 allows request smuggling attacks where goliath is used as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. It is possible to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the Content-Length header twice. Furthermore, invalid Transfer Encoding headers were found to be parsed as valid which could be leveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks.
Aliases

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2020-7671",
    "description": "goliath through 1.0.6 allows request smuggling attacks where goliath is used as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. It is possible to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the Content-Length header twice. Furthermore, invalid Transfer Encoding headers were found to be parsed as valid which could be leveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks.",
    "id": "GSD-2020-7671"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "package": {
            "ecosystem": "RubyGems",
            "name": "goliath",
            "purl": "pkg:gem/goliath"
          }
        }
      ],
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2020-7671",
        "GHSA-3892-2r52-p65m"
      ],
      "details": "goliath through 1.0.6 allows request smuggling attacks where goliath\nis used as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. It is possible\nto conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the Content-Length header twice.\nFurthermore, invalid Transfer Encoding headers were found to be parsed as valid\nwhich could be leveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks.\n",
      "id": "GSD-2020-7671",
      "modified": "2021-05-24T00:00:00.000Z",
      "published": "2021-05-24T00:00:00.000Z",
      "references": [
        {
          "type": "WEB",
          "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3892-2r52-p65m"
        }
      ],
      "schema_version": "1.4.0",
      "severity": [
        {
          "score": 7.5,
          "type": "CVSS_V3"
        }
      ],
      "summary": "HTTP Request Smuggling in goliath"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "report@snyk.io",
        "ID": "CVE-2020-7671",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "goliath",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "All versions including 1.0.6"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "goliath through 1.0.6 allows request smuggling attacks where goliath is used as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. It is possible to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the Content-Length header twice. Furthermore, invalid Transfer Encoding headers were found to be parsed as valid which could be leveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "HTTP Request Smuggling"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/postrank-labs/goliath/issues/351,",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/postrank-labs/goliath/issues/351,"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-GOLIATH-569136",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-GOLIATH-569136"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db": {
      "cve": "2020-7671",
      "cvss_v3": 7.5,
      "date": "2021-05-24",
      "description": "goliath through 1.0.6 allows request smuggling attacks where goliath\nis used as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. It is possible\nto conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the Content-Length header twice.\nFurthermore, invalid Transfer Encoding headers were found to be parsed as valid\nwhich could be leveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks.\n",
      "gem": "goliath",
      "ghsa": "3892-2r52-p65m",
      "title": "HTTP Request Smuggling in goliath",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3892-2r52-p65m"
    },
    "gitlab.com": {
      "advisories": [
        {
          "affected_range": "\u003c=1.0.6",
          "affected_versions": "All versions up to 1.0.6",
          "cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
          "cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
          "cwe_ids": [
            "CWE-1035",
            "CWE-444",
            "CWE-937"
          ],
          "date": "2020-06-16",
          "description": "goliath allows request smuggling attacks where goliath is used as a used as a backend with a frontend proxy that is also vulnerable. It is possible to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the `Content-Length` header twice. Furthermore, invalid `Transfer-Encoding` headers were found to be parsed as valid which could be leveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks.",
          "fixed_versions": [],
          "identifier": "CVE-2020-7671",
          "identifiers": [
            "CVE-2020-7671"
          ],
          "not_impacted": "",
          "package_slug": "gem/goliath",
          "pubdate": "2020-06-10",
          "solution": "Unfortunately, there is no solution available yet.",
          "title": "Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests (HTTP Request Smuggling)",
          "urls": [
            "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-7671"
          ],
          "uuid": "bdd72dac-4f20-468e-98fe-097e77c3d075"
        }
      ]
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:goliath_project:goliath:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndIncluding": "1.0.6",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "report@snyk.io",
          "ID": "CVE-2020-7671"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "goliath through 1.0.6 allows request smuggling attacks where goliath is used as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. It is possible to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the Content-Length header twice. Furthermore, invalid Transfer Encoding headers were found to be parsed as valid which could be leveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-444"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/postrank-labs/goliath/issues/351,",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/postrank-labs/goliath/issues/351,"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-GOLIATH-569136",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-GOLIATH-569136"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "acInsufInfo": false,
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 5.0,
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
          "impactScore": 2.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
          "impactScore": 3.6
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2020-06-16T18:46Z",
      "publishedDate": "2020-06-10T16:15Z"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…