gsd-2021-3521
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:23
Details
There is a flaw in RPM's signature functionality. OpenPGP subkeys are associated with a primary key via a "binding signature." RPM does not check the binding signature of subkeys prior to importing them. If an attacker is able to add or socially engineer another party to add a malicious subkey to a legitimate public key, RPM could wrongly trust a malicious signature. The greatest impact of this flaw is to data integrity. To exploit this flaw, an attacker must either compromise an RPM repository or convince an administrator to install an untrusted RPM or public key. It is strongly recommended to only use RPMs and public keys from trusted sources.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2021-3521",
"description": "There is a flaw in RPM\u0027s signature functionality. OpenPGP subkeys are associated with a primary key via a \"binding signature.\" RPM does not check the binding signature of subkeys prior to importing them. If an attacker is able to add or socially engineer another party to add a malicious subkey to a legitimate public key, RPM could wrongly trust a malicious signature. The greatest impact of this flaw is to data integrity. To exploit this flaw, an attacker must either compromise an RPM repository or convince an administrator to install an untrusted RPM or public key. It is strongly recommended to only use RPMs and public keys from trusted sources.",
"id": "GSD-2021-3521",
"references": [
"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3521.html",
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:0634",
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:0368",
"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:0254",
"https://linux.oracle.com/cve/CVE-2021-3521.html",
"https://advisories.mageia.org/CVE-2021-3521.html"
]
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-3521"
],
"details": "There is a flaw in RPM\u0027s signature functionality. OpenPGP subkeys are associated with a primary key via a \"binding signature.\" RPM does not check the binding signature of subkeys prior to importing them. If an attacker is able to add or socially engineer another party to add a malicious subkey to a legitimate public key, RPM could wrongly trust a malicious signature. The greatest impact of this flaw is to data integrity. To exploit this flaw, an attacker must either compromise an RPM repository or convince an administrator to install an untrusted RPM or public key. It is strongly recommended to only use RPMs and public keys from trusted sources.",
"id": "GSD-2021-3521",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:23:35.281268Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2021-3521",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "RPM",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "=",
"version_value": "Fixed in rpm-4.18.0-beta1, rpm-4.18.0-alpha2, rpm-4.18.0-alpha1 ."
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "There is a flaw in RPM\u0027s signature functionality. OpenPGP subkeys are associated with a primary key via a \"binding signature.\" RPM does not check the binding signature of subkeys prior to importing them. If an attacker is able to add or socially engineer another party to add a malicious subkey to a legitimate public key, RPM could wrongly trust a malicious signature. The greatest impact of this flaw is to data integrity. To exploit this flaw, an attacker must either compromise an RPM repository or convince an administrator to install an untrusted RPM or public key. It is strongly recommended to only use RPMs and public keys from trusted sources."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-347 - Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941098",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941098"
},
{
"name": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3521",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3521"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1795/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1795/"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/bd36c5dc9fb6d90c46fbfed8c2d67516fc571ec8",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/bd36c5dc9fb6d90c46fbfed8c2d67516fc571ec8"
},
{
"name": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-22",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-22"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:rpm:rpm:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndExcluding": "4.17.1",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
"ID": "CVE-2021-3521"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "There is a flaw in RPM\u0027s signature functionality. OpenPGP subkeys are associated with a primary key via a \"binding signature.\" RPM does not check the binding signature of subkeys prior to importing them. If an attacker is able to add or socially engineer another party to add a malicious subkey to a legitimate public key, RPM could wrongly trust a malicious signature. The greatest impact of this flaw is to data integrity. To exploit this flaw, an attacker must either compromise an RPM repository or convince an administrator to install an untrusted RPM or public key. It is strongly recommended to only use RPMs and public keys from trusted sources."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-347"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3521",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3521"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1795/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1795/"
},
{
"name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941098",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941098"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/bd36c5dc9fb6d90c46fbfed8c2d67516fc571ec8",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/bd36c5dc9fb6d90c46fbfed8c2d67516fc571ec8"
},
{
"name": "GLSA-202210-22",
"refsource": "GENTOO",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-22"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 1.0,
"impactScore": 3.6
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2023-02-12T23:41Z",
"publishedDate": "2022-08-22T15:15Z"
}
}
}
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.