gsd-2021-46854
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:23
Details
mod_radius in ProFTPD before 1.3.7c allows memory disclosure to RADIUS servers because it copies blocks of 16 characters.
Aliases
Aliases
{ GSD: { alias: "CVE-2021-46854", id: "GSD-2021-46854", }, gsd: { metadata: { exploitCode: "unknown", remediation: "unknown", reportConfidence: "confirmed", type: "vulnerability", }, osvSchema: { aliases: [ "CVE-2021-46854", ], details: "mod_radius in ProFTPD before 1.3.7c allows memory disclosure to RADIUS servers because it copies blocks of 16 characters.", id: "GSD-2021-46854", modified: "2023-12-13T01:23:32.732499Z", schema_version: "1.4.0", }, }, namespaces: { "cve.org": { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "cve@mitre.org", ID: "CVE-2021-46854", STATE: "PUBLIC", }, affects: { vendor: { vendor_data: [ { product: { product_data: [ { product_name: "n/a", version: { version_data: [ { version_value: "n/a", }, ], }, }, ], }, vendor_name: "n/a", }, ], }, }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "eng", value: "mod_radius in ProFTPD before 1.3.7c allows memory disclosure to RADIUS servers because it copies blocks of 16 characters.", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "eng", value: "n/a", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/issues/1284", refsource: "MISC", url: "https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/issues/1284", }, { name: "https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/pull/1285", refsource: "MISC", url: "https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/pull/1285", }, { name: "https://bugs.gentoo.org/811495", refsource: "MISC", url: "https://bugs.gentoo.org/811495", }, { name: "http://www.proftpd.org/docs/RELEASE_NOTES-1.3.7e", refsource: "MISC", url: "http://www.proftpd.org/docs/RELEASE_NOTES-1.3.7e", }, { name: "GLSA-202305-03", refsource: "GENTOO", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202305-03", }, ], }, }, "nvd.nist.gov": { configurations: { CVE_data_version: "4.0", nodes: [ { children: [], cpe_match: [ { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:proftpd:proftpd:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], versionEndExcluding: "1.3.7c", vulnerable: true, }, ], operator: "OR", }, ], }, cve: { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "cve@mitre.org", ID: "CVE-2021-46854", }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "en", value: "mod_radius in ProFTPD before 1.3.7c allows memory disclosure to RADIUS servers because it copies blocks of 16 characters.", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-401", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/issues/1284", refsource: "MISC", tags: [ "Exploit", "Issue Tracking", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/issues/1284", }, { name: "https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/pull/1285", refsource: "MISC", tags: [ "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/pull/1285", }, { name: "https://bugs.gentoo.org/811495", refsource: "MISC", tags: [ "Issue Tracking", "Third Party Advisory", ], url: "https://bugs.gentoo.org/811495", }, { name: "http://www.proftpd.org/docs/RELEASE_NOTES-1.3.7e", refsource: "MISC", tags: [ "Release Notes", "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "http://www.proftpd.org/docs/RELEASE_NOTES-1.3.7e", }, { name: "GLSA-202305-03", refsource: "GENTOO", tags: [], url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202305-03", }, ], }, }, impact: { baseMetricV3: { cvssV3: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "NONE", baseScore: 7.5, baseSeverity: "HIGH", confidentialityImpact: "HIGH", integrityImpact: "NONE", privilegesRequired: "NONE", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 3.9, impactScore: 3.6, }, }, lastModifiedDate: "2023-05-03T11:15Z", publishedDate: "2022-11-23T07:15Z", }, }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.