GSD-2022-3212
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:19Details
<bytes::Bytes as axum_core::extract::FromRequest>::from_request would not, by default, set a limit for the size of the request body. That meant if a malicious peer would send a very large (or infinite) body your server might run out of memory and crash. This also applies to these extractors which used Bytes::from_request internally: axum::extract::Form axum::extract::Json String
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2022-3212",
"description": "\u003cbytes::Bytes as axum_core::extract::FromRequest\u003e::from_request would not, by default, set a limit for the size of the request body. That meant if a malicious peer would send a very large (or infinite) body your server might run out of memory and crash. This also applies to these extractors which used Bytes::from_request internally: axum::extract::Form axum::extract::Json String",
"id": "GSD-2022-3212"
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-3212"
],
"details": "\u003cbytes::Bytes as axum_core::extract::FromRequest\u003e::from_request would not, by default, set a limit for the size of the request body. That meant if a malicious peer would send a very large (or infinite) body your server might run out of memory and crash. This also applies to these extractors which used Bytes::from_request internally: axum::extract::Form axum::extract::Json String",
"id": "GSD-2022-3212",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:40.573165Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security@jfrog.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-3212",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "DoS in axum-core due to missing request size limit"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "axum-core",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"platform": "",
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_name": "",
"version_value": "0.2.8"
},
{
"platform": "",
"version_affected": "=",
"version_name": "",
"version_value": "0.3.0-rc.1"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "tokio-rs"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "\u003cbytes::Bytes as axum_core::extract::FromRequest\u003e::from_request would not, by default, set a limit for the size of the request body. That meant if a malicious peer would send a very large (or infinite) body your server might run out of memory and crash. This also applies to these extractors which used Bytes::from_request internally: axum::extract::Form axum::extract::Json String"
}
]
},
"impact": {
"cvss": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://research.jfrog.com/vulnerabilities/axum-core-dos/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://research.jfrog.com/vulnerabilities/axum-core-dos/"
},
{
"name": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2022-0055.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2022-0055.html"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:axum-core_project:axum-core:*:*:*:*:*:rust:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndExcluding": "0.2.8",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:axum-core_project:axum-core:0.3.0:rc1:*:*:*:rust:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security@jfrog.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-3212"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "\u003cbytes::Bytes as axum_core::extract::FromRequest\u003e::from_request would not, by default, set a limit for the size of the request body. That meant if a malicious peer would send a very large (or infinite) body your server might run out of memory and crash. This also applies to these extractors which used Bytes::from_request internally: axum::extract::Form axum::extract::Json String"
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-770"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "N/A",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Issue Tracking",
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2022-0055.html"
},
{
"name": "N/A",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://research.jfrog.com/vulnerabilities/axum-core-dos/"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2022-09-16T19:22Z",
"publishedDate": "2022-09-14T16:15Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…