gsd-2023-1664
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:20
Details
A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw depends on a non-default configuration "Revalidate Client Certificate" to be enabled and the reverse proxy is not validating the certificate before Keycloak. Using this method an attacker may choose the certificate which will be validated by the server. If this happens and the KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE variable is missing/misconfigured, any trustfile may be accepted with the logging information of "Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available". This may not impact availability as the attacker would have no access to the server, but consumer applications Integrity or Confidentiality may be impacted considering a possible access to them. Considering the environment is correctly set to use "Revalidate Client Certificate" this flaw is avoidable.
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2023-1664", "id": "GSD-2023-1664" }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2023-1664" ], "details": "A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw depends on a non-default configuration \"Revalidate Client Certificate\" to be enabled and the reverse proxy is not validating the certificate before Keycloak. Using this method an attacker may choose the certificate which will be validated by the server. If this happens and the KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE variable is missing/misconfigured, any trustfile may be accepted with the logging information of \"Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available\". This may not impact availability as the attacker would have no access to the server, but consumer applications Integrity or Confidentiality may be impacted considering a possible access to them. Considering the environment is correctly set to use \"Revalidate Client Certificate\" this flaw is avoidable.", "id": "GSD-2023-1664", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:41.676412Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2023-1664", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "Keycloak", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "NA" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw depends on a non-default configuration \"Revalidate Client Certificate\" to be enabled and the reverse proxy is not validating the certificate before Keycloak. Using this method an attacker may choose the certificate which will be validated by the server. If this happens and the KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE variable is missing/misconfigured, any trustfile may be accepted with the logging information of \"Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available\". This may not impact availability as the attacker would have no access to the server, but consumer applications Integrity or Confidentiality may be impacted considering a possible access to them. Considering the environment is correctly set to use \"Revalidate Client Certificate\" this flaw is avoidable." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "CWE-295" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182196\u0026comment#0", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182196\u0026comment#0" } ] } }, "gitlab.com": { "advisories": [ { "affected_range": "(,21.1.1]", "affected_versions": "All versions up to 21.1.1", "cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N", "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-1035", "CWE-295", "CWE-937" ], "date": "2023-06-03", "description": "A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw depends on a non-default configuration \"Revalidate Client Certificate\" to be enabled and the reverse proxy is not validating the certificate before Keycloak. Using this method an attacker may choose the certificate which will be validated by the server. If this happens and the KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE variable is missing/misconfigured, any trustfile may be accepted with the logging information of \"Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available\". This may not impact availability as the attacker would have no access to the server, but consumer applications Integrity or Confidentiality may be impacted considering a possible access to them. Considering the environment is correctly set to use \"Revalidate Client Certificate\" this flaw is avoidable.", "fixed_versions": [], "identifier": "CVE-2023-1664", "identifiers": [ "CVE-2023-1664", "GHSA-c892-cwq6-qrqf" ], "not_impacted": "", "package_slug": "maven/org.keycloak/keycloak-core", "pubdate": "2023-05-26", "solution": "Unfortunately, there is no solution available yet.", "title": "Keycloak vulnerable to untrusted certificate validation", "urls": [ "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-1664", "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182196\u0026comment#0", "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-1664", "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-c892-cwq6-qrqf" ], "uuid": "2df163f4-0584-4e8a-915e-88d8b052d428" } ] }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "configurations": { "CVE_data_version": "4.0", "nodes": [ { "children": [], "cpe_match": [ { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:keycloak:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign-on:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:build_of_quarkus:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_a-mq:7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true }, { "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:migration_toolkit_for_runtimes:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe_name": [], "vulnerable": true } ], "operator": "OR" } ] }, "cve": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com", "ID": "CVE-2023-1664" }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw depends on a non-default configuration \"Revalidate Client Certificate\" to be enabled and the reverse proxy is not validating the certificate before Keycloak. Using this method an attacker may choose the certificate which will be validated by the server. If this happens and the KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE variable is missing/misconfigured, any trustfile may be accepted with the logging information of \"Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available\". This may not impact availability as the attacker would have no access to the server, but consumer applications Integrity or Confidentiality may be impacted considering a possible access to them. Considering the environment is correctly set to use \"Revalidate Client Certificate\" this flaw is avoidable." } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-295" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182196\u0026comment#0", "refsource": "MISC", "tags": [ "Issue Tracking", "Vendor Advisory" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182196\u0026comment#0" } ] } }, "impact": { "baseMetricV3": { "cvssV3": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "NONE", "baseScore": 6.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "LOW", "integrityImpact": "LOW", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 2.5 } }, "lastModifiedDate": "2023-06-03T03:56Z", "publishedDate": "2023-05-26T18:15Z" } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.