MOKSHA-2026-0029

Vulnerability from moksha – Published: 2026-04-24 06:00 – Updated:
VLAI
Title
SR-IOV VIF Whitelist Bypass via VIF.other_config
Summary
On SR-IOV-backed VIFs in XAPI-based hypervisors (XenServer, XCP-ng), all VIF.other_config keys bypass the whitelist filter and are written unfiltered to guest-readable xenstore. The standard VIF path (Device.Vif.add) applies a 7-key whitelist; the SR-IOV path (Device.NetSriovVf.add) does not apply this filter. This breaks security equivalence between standard and SR-IOV VIFs, allowing a vm-admin to inject arbitrary key-value pairs into guest-readable xenstore on SR-IOV networks.
CWE
  • CWE-862 - Missing Authorization
  • CWE-200 - Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
References
Impacted products
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "XenServer",
          "vendor": "Cloud Software Group",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "all",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "product": "XCP-ng",
          "vendor": "Vates",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "all",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jakob Wolffhechel, Moksha"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "On SR-IOV-backed VIFs in XAPI-based hypervisors (XenServer, XCP-ng), all VIF.other_config keys bypass the whitelist filter and are written unfiltered to guest-readable xenstore. The standard VIF path (Device.Vif.add) applies a 7-key whitelist; the SR-IOV path (Device.NetSriovVf.add) does not apply this filter. This breaks security equivalence between standard and SR-IOV VIFs, allowing a vm-admin to inject arbitrary key-value pairs into guest-readable xenstore on SR-IOV networks."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 7.1,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS"
        },
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "baseScore": 5.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0"
          },
          "format": "CVSS"
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-862",
              "description": "Missing Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-200",
              "description": "Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T06:00:00Z",
        "orgId": "moksha.dk",
        "shortName": "Moksha"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://cna.moksha.dk/MOKSHA-2026-0029"
        }
      ],
      "title": "SR-IOV VIF Whitelist Bypass via VIF.other_config"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "alternateIds": [
      "GCVE-117-2026-0029"
    ],
    "assignerOrgId": "moksha.dk",
    "cveId": "MOKSHA-2026-0029",
    "datePublished": "2026-04-24T06:00:00Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED",
    "x_moksha_note": "Self-issued advisory. MOKSHA-2026-NNNN is not a MITRE CVE ID. Schema follows CVE JSON 5.1 for tooling compatibility. alternateIds contains GCVE cross-references (GNA #117) and will also carry MITRE CVE IDs if assigned."
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…