MOKSHA-2026-0083

Vulnerability from moksha – Published: 2026-04-24 06:00 – Updated:
VLAI
Title
Boot Order Manipulation via VM.HVM_boot_params order
Summary
A vm-admin in XAPI-based hypervisors (XenServer, XCP-ng) can set an arbitrary boot order string in VM.HVM_boot_params:order. The value is passed verbatim to QEMU as the -boot order argument at device.ml:3957-3958. XAPI performs no validation beyond replacing empty values with the default. QEMU ignores unrecognized characters, limiting impact to forcing PXE network boot when the attacker controls DHCP/PXE infrastructure. The field has zero map_keys_roles entries.
CWE
  • CWE-20 - Improper Input Validation
  • CWE-862 - Missing Authorization
References
Impacted products
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "XenServer",
          "vendor": "Cloud Software Group",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "all",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "product": "XCP-ng",
          "vendor": "Vates",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "all",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Jakob Wolffhechel, Moksha"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A vm-admin in XAPI-based hypervisors (XenServer, XCP-ng) can set an arbitrary boot order string in VM.HVM_boot_params:order. The value is passed verbatim to QEMU as the -boot order argument at device.ml:3957-3958. XAPI performs no validation beyond replacing empty values with the default. QEMU ignores unrecognized characters, limiting impact to forcing PXE network boot when the attacker controls DHCP/PXE infrastructure. The field has zero map_keys_roles entries."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 3.1,
            "baseSeverity": "LOW",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS"
        },
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "baseScore": 5.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
            "version": "4.0"
          },
          "format": "CVSS"
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-20",
              "description": "Improper Input Validation",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-862",
              "description": "Missing Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-04-24T06:00:00Z",
        "orgId": "moksha.dk",
        "shortName": "Moksha"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://cna.moksha.dk/MOKSHA-2026-0083"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Boot Order Manipulation via VM.HVM_boot_params order"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "alternateIds": [
      "GCVE-117-2026-0083"
    ],
    "assignerOrgId": "moksha.dk",
    "cveId": "MOKSHA-2026-0083",
    "datePublished": "2026-04-24T06:00:00Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED",
    "x_moksha_note": "Self-issued advisory. MOKSHA-2026-NNNN is not a MITRE CVE ID. Schema follows CVE JSON 5.1 for tooling compatibility. alternateIds contains GCVE cross-references (GNA #117) and will also carry MITRE CVE IDs if assigned."
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…