{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T07:17:11.837Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/GCC%20Stack%20Protector%20Vulnerability%20AArch64"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/metaredteam/external-disclosures/security/advisories/GHSA-x7ch-h5rf-w2mf"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      },
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2023-4039",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-06-03T16:04:55.934999Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T17:19:09.321Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "affected",
          "product": "Arm GNU Toolchain",
          "vendor": "Arm Ltd",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "All versions where option -fstack-protector is used"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "GCC",
          "vendor": "GNU",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "All versions of GCC that target AArch64 when option -fstack-protector is used"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "configurations": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "The specific conditions where the stack-protector fails to give the desired level of protection are when:\n\n\n\u003cul\u003e\n    \u003cli\u003eusing GCC (all unpatched versions) targeting AArch64\u003c/li\u003e\n    \u003cli\u003eand when the -fstack-protector option is used\u003c/li\u003e\n    \u003cli\u003eand when the program uses C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or alloca()\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAnd to be exploitable there must also be a prior vulnerability in the\n program such that an attacker can cause a buffer overflow in these \nlocal variables that overwrites saved register values in the stack.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "The specific conditions where the stack-protector fails to give the desired level of protection are when:\n\n\n\n      *  using GCC (all unpatched versions) targeting AArch64\n\n      *  and when the -fstack-protector option is used\n\n      *  and when the program uses C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or alloca()\n\n\n\n\nAnd to be exploitable there must also be a prior vulnerability in the\n program such that an attacker can cause a buffer overflow in these \nlocal variables that overwrites saved register values in the stack."
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
          "value": "Tom Hebb from Meta Red Team X and Maria Markstedter from Azeria Labs"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2023-09-12T09:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003e\n\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e**DISPUTED** A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains \nthat target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer \noverflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application \nwithout this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies \nto C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using \nalloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized \nlocal variables.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe default behavior when the stack-protector \ndetects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in \ncontrolled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer \noverflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change \nprogram flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to\n go further and affect confidentiality or integrity. NOTE: The GCC project argues that this is a missed hardening bug and not a vulnerability by itself.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "**DISPUTED**A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains \nthat target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer \noverflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application \nwithout this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies \nto C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using \nalloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized \nlocal variables.\n\nThe default behavior when the stack-protector \ndetects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in \ncontrolled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer \noverflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change \nprogram flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to\n go further and affect confidentiality or integrity. NOTE: The GCC project argues that this is a missed hardening bug and not a vulnerability by itself."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-100",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-100 Overflow Buffers"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 4.8,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-693",
              "description": "CWE-693 Protection Mechanism Failure",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-06-13T22:20:07.881Z",
        "orgId": "56a131ea-b967-4a0d-a41e-5f3549952846",
        "shortName": "Arm"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/GCC%20Stack%20Protector%20Vulnerability%20AArch64"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/metaredteam/external-disclosures/security/advisories/GHSA-x7ch-h5rf-w2mf"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "Recompile vulnerable code using an updated toolchain.\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "Recompile vulnerable code using an updated toolchain."
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "tags": [
        "disputed"
      ],
      "title": "GCC\u0027s-fstack-protector fails to guard dynamically-sized local variables on AArch64",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
      },
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "arm-security@arm.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2023-4039",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "Arm GNU Toolchain",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "All versions of GCC that target AArch64 when option -fstack-protector is used"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "Arm Ltd"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "5.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "**DISPUTED** A failure in the -fstack-protector feature in GCC-based toolchains that target AArch64 allows an attacker to exploit an existing buffer overflow in dynamically-sized local variables in your application without this being detected. This stack-protector failure only applies to C99-style dynamically-sized local variables or those created using alloca(). The stack-protector operates as intended for statically-sized local variables. The default behavior when the stack-protector detects an overflow is to terminate your application, resulting in controlled loss of availability. An attacker who can exploit a buffer overflow without triggering the stack-protector might be able to change program flow control to cause an uncontrolled loss of availability or to go further and affect confidentiality or integrity. NOTE: The GCC project argues that this is a missed hardening bug and not a vulnerability by itself."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "GCC\u0027s-fstack-protector fails to guard dynamically-sized local variables on AArch64"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/GCC%20Stack%20Protector%20Vulnerability%20AArch64",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://developer.arm.com/Arm%20Security%20Center/GCC%20Stack%20Protector%20Vulnerability%20AArch64"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "56a131ea-b967-4a0d-a41e-5f3549952846",
    "assignerShortName": "Arm",
    "cveId": "CVE-2023-4039",
    "datePublished": "2023-09-13T08:05:10.274Z",
    "dateReserved": "2023-08-01T10:38:03.032Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-06-23T17:19:09.321Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2"
}