PYSEC-2019-133

Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2019-04-18 21:29 - Updated: 2019-09-14 18:15
VLAI?
Details

The urllib3 library before 1.24.2 for Python mishandles certain cases where the desired set of CA certificates is different from the OS store of CA certificates, which results in SSL connections succeeding in situations where a verification failure is the correct outcome. This is related to use of the ssl_context, ca_certs, or ca_certs_dir argument.

Impacted products
Name purl
urllib3 pkg:pypi/urllib3
Aliases
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "urllib3",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/urllib3"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.24.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.2",
        "0.3",
        "0.3.1",
        "0.4.0",
        "0.4.1",
        "1.0",
        "1.0.1",
        "1.0.2",
        "1.1",
        "1.2",
        "1.2.1",
        "1.2.2",
        "1.3",
        "1.4",
        "1.5",
        "1.6",
        "1.7",
        "1.7.1",
        "1.8",
        "1.8.2",
        "1.8.3",
        "1.9",
        "1.9.1",
        "1.10",
        "1.10.1",
        "1.10.2",
        "1.10.3",
        "1.10.4",
        "1.11",
        "1.12",
        "1.13",
        "1.13.1",
        "1.14",
        "1.15",
        "1.15.1",
        "1.16",
        "1.17",
        "1.18",
        "1.18.1",
        "1.19",
        "1.19.1",
        "1.20",
        "1.21",
        "1.21.1",
        "1.22",
        "1.23",
        "1.24",
        "1.24.1"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2019-11324",
    "GHSA-mh33-7rrq-662w"
  ],
  "details": "The urllib3 library before 1.24.2 for Python mishandles certain cases where the desired set of CA certificates is different from the OS store of CA certificates, which results in SSL connections succeeding in situations where a verification failure is the correct outcome. This is related to use of the ssl_context, ca_certs, or ca_certs_dir argument.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2019-133",
  "modified": "2019-09-14T18:15:00Z",
  "published": "2019-04-18T21:29:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/compare/a6ec68a...1efadf4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/04/19/1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3990-1/"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00039.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00041.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3335"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3590"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NKGPJLVLVYCL4L4B4G5TIOTVK4BKPG72/"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XOSA2NT4DUQDBEIWE6O7KKD24XND7TE2/"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-mh33-7rrq-662w"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.