pysec-2019-133
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2019-04-18 21:29
Modified
2019-09-14 18:15
Details
The urllib3 library before 1.24.2 for Python mishandles certain cases where the desired set of CA certificates is different from the OS store of CA certificates, which results in SSL connections succeeding in situations where a verification failure is the correct outcome. This is related to use of the ssl_context, ca_certs, or ca_certs_dir argument.
Impacted products
Name | purl |
---|---|
urllib3 | pkg:pypi/urllib3 |
Aliases
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "PyPI", name: "urllib3", purl: "pkg:pypi/urllib3", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "1.24.2", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], versions: [ "0.2", "0.3", "0.3.1", "0.4.0", "0.4.1", "1.0", "1.0.1", "1.0.2", "1.1", "1.2", "1.2.1", "1.2.2", "1.3", "1.4", "1.5", "1.6", "1.7", "1.7.1", "1.8", "1.8.2", "1.8.3", "1.9", "1.9.1", "1.10", "1.10.1", "1.10.2", "1.10.3", "1.10.4", "1.11", "1.12", "1.13", "1.13.1", "1.14", "1.15", "1.15.1", "1.16", "1.17", "1.18", "1.18.1", "1.19", "1.19.1", "1.20", "1.21", "1.21.1", "1.22", "1.23", "1.24", "1.24.1", ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2019-11324", "GHSA-mh33-7rrq-662w", ], details: "The urllib3 library before 1.24.2 for Python mishandles certain cases where the desired set of CA certificates is different from the OS store of CA certificates, which results in SSL connections succeeding in situations where a verification failure is the correct outcome. This is related to use of the ssl_context, ca_certs, or ca_certs_dir argument.", id: "PYSEC-2019-133", modified: "2019-09-14T18:15:00Z", published: "2019-04-18T21:29:00Z", references: [ { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/compare/a6ec68a...1efadf4", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/04/19/1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3990-1/", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00039.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00041.html", }, { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3335", }, { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3590", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NKGPJLVLVYCL4L4B4G5TIOTVK4BKPG72/", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XOSA2NT4DUQDBEIWE6O7KKD24XND7TE2/", }, { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-mh33-7rrq-662w", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.