PYSEC-2020-161
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2020-08-26 03:15 - Updated: 2021-01-28 18:00
VLAI?
Details
A flaw was found in the solaris_zone module from the Ansible Community modules. When setting the name for the zone on the Solaris host, the zone name is checked by listing the process with the 'ps' bare command on the remote machine. An attacker could take advantage of this flaw by crafting the name of the zone and executing arbitrary commands in the remote host. Ansible Engine 2.7.15, 2.8.7, and 2.9.2 as well as previous versions are affected.
Impacted products
| Name | purl | ansible | pkg:pypi/ansible |
|---|
Aliases
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "ansible",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/ansible"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.7.15"
},
{
"introduced": "2.8.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.8.7"
},
{
"introduced": "2.9.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.9.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"1.0",
"1.1",
"1.2",
"1.2.1",
"1.2.2",
"1.2.3",
"1.3.0",
"1.3.1",
"1.3.2",
"1.3.3",
"1.3.4",
"1.4",
"1.4.1",
"1.4.2",
"1.4.3",
"1.4.4",
"1.4.5",
"1.5",
"1.5.1",
"1.5.2",
"1.5.3",
"1.5.4",
"1.5.5",
"1.6",
"1.6.1",
"1.6.2",
"1.6.3",
"1.6.4",
"1.6.5",
"1.6.6",
"1.6.7",
"1.6.8",
"1.6.9",
"1.6.10",
"1.7",
"1.7.1",
"1.7.2",
"1.8",
"1.8.1",
"1.8.2",
"1.8.3",
"1.8.4",
"1.9.0",
"1.9.0.1",
"1.9.1",
"1.9.2",
"1.9.3",
"1.9.4",
"1.9.5",
"1.9.6",
"2.0.0.0",
"2.0.0",
"2.0.0.1",
"2.0.0.2",
"2.0.1.0",
"2.0.2.0",
"2.1.0.0",
"2.1.1.0",
"2.1.2.0",
"2.1.3.0",
"2.1.4.0",
"2.1.5.0",
"2.1.6.0",
"2.2.0.0",
"2.2.1.0",
"2.2.2.0",
"2.2.3.0",
"2.3.0.0",
"2.3.1.0",
"2.3.2.0",
"2.3.3.0",
"2.4.0.0",
"2.4.1.0",
"2.4.2.0",
"2.4.3.0",
"2.4.4.0",
"2.4.5.0",
"2.4.6.0",
"2.5.0a1",
"2.5.0b1",
"2.5.0b2",
"2.5.0rc1",
"2.5.0rc2",
"2.5.0rc3",
"2.5.0",
"2.5.1",
"2.5.2",
"2.5.3",
"2.5.4",
"2.5.5",
"2.5.6",
"2.5.7",
"2.5.8",
"2.5.9",
"2.5.10",
"2.5.11",
"2.5.12",
"2.5.13",
"2.5.14",
"2.5.15",
"2.6.0a1",
"2.6.0a2",
"2.6.0rc1",
"2.6.0rc2",
"2.6.0rc3",
"2.6.0rc4",
"2.6.0rc5",
"2.6.0",
"2.6.1",
"2.6.2",
"2.6.3",
"2.6.4",
"2.6.5",
"2.6.6",
"2.6.7",
"2.6.8",
"2.6.9",
"2.6.10",
"2.6.11",
"2.6.12",
"2.6.13",
"2.6.14",
"2.6.15",
"2.6.16",
"2.6.17",
"2.6.18",
"2.6.19",
"2.6.20",
"2.7.0.dev0",
"2.7.0a1",
"2.7.0b1",
"2.7.0rc1",
"2.7.0rc2",
"2.7.0rc3",
"2.7.0rc4",
"2.7.0",
"2.7.1",
"2.7.2",
"2.7.3",
"2.7.4",
"2.7.5",
"2.7.6",
"2.7.7",
"2.7.8",
"2.7.9",
"2.7.10",
"2.7.11",
"2.7.12",
"2.7.13",
"2.7.14",
"2.8.0",
"2.8.1",
"2.8.2",
"2.8.3",
"2.8.4",
"2.8.5",
"2.8.6",
"2.9.0",
"2.9.1"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-14904",
"GHSA-gwr8-5j83-483c"
],
"details": "A flaw was found in the solaris_zone module from the Ansible Community modules. When setting the name for the zone on the Solaris host, the zone name is checked by listing the process with the \u0027ps\u0027 bare command on the remote machine. An attacker could take advantage of this flaw by crafting the name of the zone and executing arbitrary commands in the remote host. Ansible Engine 2.7.15, 2.8.7, and 2.9.2 as well as previous versions are affected.",
"id": "PYSEC-2020-161",
"modified": "2021-01-28T18:00:00Z",
"published": "2020-08-26T03:15:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/65686"
},
{
"type": "REPORT",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1776944"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/01/msg00023.html"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-gwr8-5j83-483c"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…