PYSEC-2021-321

Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2021-09-17 21:15 - Updated: 2021-09-17 22:30
VLAI?
Details

Wasmtime is an open source runtime for WebAssembly & WASI. In Wasmtime from version 0.26.0 and before version 0.30.0 is affected by a memory unsoundness vulnerability. There was an invalid free and out-of-bounds read and write bug when running Wasm that uses externrefs in Wasmtime. To trigger this bug, Wasmtime needs to be running Wasm that uses externrefs, the host creates non-null externrefs, Wasmtime performs a garbage collection (GC), and there has to be a Wasm frame on the stack that is at a GC safepoint where there are no live references at this safepoint, and there is a safepoint with live references earlier in this frame's function. Under this scenario, Wasmtime would incorrectly use the GC stack map for the safepoint from earlier in the function instead of the empty safepoint. This would result in Wasmtime treating arbitrary stack slots as externrefs that needed to be rooted for GC. At the next GC, it would be determined that nothing was referencing these bogus externrefs (because nothing could ever reference them, because they are not really externrefs) and then Wasmtime would deallocate them and run <ExternRef as Drop>::drop on them. This results in a free of memory that is not necessarily on the heap (and shouldn't be freed at this moment even if it was), as well as potential out-of-bounds reads and writes. Even though support for externrefs (via the reference types proposal) is enabled by default, unless you are creating non-null externrefs in your host code or explicitly triggering GCs, you cannot be affected by this bug. We have reason to believe that the effective impact of this bug is relatively small because usage of externref is currently quite rare. This bug has been patched and users should upgrade to Wasmtime version 0.30.0. If you cannot upgrade Wasmtime at this time, you can avoid this bug by disabling the reference types proposal by passing false to wasmtime::Config::wasm_reference_types.

Impacted products
Name purl
wasmtime pkg:pypi/wasmtime
Aliases
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "wasmtime",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/wasmtime"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "398a73f0dd862dbe703212ebae8e34036a18c11c"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime",
          "type": "GIT"
        },
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.30.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.0.1",
        "0.0.2",
        "0.11.0",
        "0.12.0",
        "0.15.0",
        "0.15.1",
        "0.16.0",
        "0.16.1",
        "0.17.0",
        "0.18.0",
        "0.18.1",
        "0.18.2",
        "0.19.0",
        "0.20.0",
        "0.21.0",
        "0.22.0",
        "0.23.0",
        "0.24.0",
        "0.25.0",
        "0.26.0",
        "0.27.0",
        "0.28.0",
        "0.28.1",
        "0.29.0",
        "0.9.0"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-39218",
    "GHSA-4873-36h9-wv49"
  ],
  "details": "Wasmtime is an open source runtime for WebAssembly \u0026 WASI. In Wasmtime from version 0.26.0 and before version 0.30.0 is affected by a memory unsoundness vulnerability. There was an invalid free and out-of-bounds read and write bug when running Wasm that uses `externref`s in Wasmtime. To trigger this bug, Wasmtime needs to be running Wasm that uses `externref`s, the host creates non-null `externrefs`, Wasmtime performs a garbage collection (GC), and there has to be a Wasm frame on the stack that is at a GC safepoint where there are no live references at this safepoint, and there is a safepoint with live references earlier in this frame\u0027s function. Under this scenario, Wasmtime would incorrectly use the GC stack map for the safepoint from earlier in the function instead of the empty safepoint. This would result in Wasmtime treating arbitrary stack slots as `externref`s that needed to be rooted for GC. At the *next* GC, it would be determined that nothing was referencing these bogus `externref`s (because nothing could ever reference them, because they are not really `externref`s) and then Wasmtime would deallocate them and run `\u003cExternRef as Drop\u003e::drop` on them. This results in a free of memory that is not necessarily on the heap (and shouldn\u0027t be freed at this moment even if it was), as well as potential out-of-bounds reads and writes. Even though support for `externref`s (via the reference types proposal) is enabled by default, unless you are creating non-null `externref`s in your host code or explicitly triggering GCs, you cannot be affected by this bug. We have reason to believe that the effective impact of this bug is relatively small because usage of `externref` is currently quite rare. This bug has been patched and users should upgrade to Wasmtime version 0.30.0. If you cannot upgrade Wasmtime at this time, you can avoid this bug by disabling the reference types proposal by passing `false` to `wasmtime::Config::wasm_reference_types`.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2021-321",
  "modified": "2021-09-17T22:30:49.898970Z",
  "published": "2021-09-17T21:15:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://crates.io/crates/wasmtime"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/security/advisories/GHSA-4873-36h9-wv49"
    },
    {
      "type": "FIX",
      "url": "https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/commit/398a73f0dd862dbe703212ebae8e34036a18c11c"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.