pysec-2021-365
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2021-10-06 18:15
Modified
2021-10-11 01:16
Details
Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the EVM. In affected versions when performing a function call inside a literal struct, there is a memory corruption issue that occurs because of an incorrect pointer to the the top of the stack. This issue has been resolved in version 0.3.0.
Impacted products
Name | purl |
---|---|
vyper | pkg:pypi/vyper |
Aliases
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "PyPI", name: "vyper", purl: "pkg:pypi/vyper", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "0.3.0", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], versions: [ "0.1.0b1", "0.1.0b10", "0.1.0b11", "0.1.0b12", "0.1.0b13", "0.1.0b14", "0.1.0b15", "0.1.0b16", "0.1.0b17", "0.1.0b2", "0.1.0b3", "0.1.0b4", "0.1.0b5", "0.1.0b6", "0.1.0b7", "0.1.0b8", "0.1.0b9", "0.2.1", "0.2.10", "0.2.11", "0.2.12", "0.2.13", "0.2.14", "0.2.15", "0.2.16", "0.2.2", "0.2.3", "0.2.4", "0.2.5", "0.2.6", "0.2.7", "0.2.8", "0.2.9", ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2021-41121", "GHSA-xv8x-pr4h-73jv", ], details: "Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the EVM. In affected versions when performing a function call inside a literal struct, there is a memory corruption issue that occurs because of an incorrect pointer to the the top of the stack. This issue has been resolved in version 0.3.0.", id: "PYSEC-2021-365", modified: "2021-10-11T01:16:43.176882Z", published: "2021-10-06T18:15:00Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-xv8x-pr4h-73jv", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/2447", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.