GHSA-xv8x-pr4h-73jv
Vulnerability from github
Published
2021-10-12 15:59
Modified
2024-11-18 22:44
Severity ?
7.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
7.7 (High) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
7.7 (High) - CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Summary
Memory corruption when returning a literal struct with a private call inside of it
Details
Impact
When performing a function call inside a literal struct, there is a memory corruption issue that occurs because of an incorrect pointer to the the top of the stack.
Patches
0.3.0 / #2447
*
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "PyPI", name: "vyper", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, { fixed: "0.3.0", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2021-41121", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-119", ], github_reviewed: true, github_reviewed_at: "2021-10-06T17:47:24Z", nvd_published_at: "2021-10-06T18:15:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "### Impact\n\nWhen performing a function call inside a literal struct, there is a memory corruption issue that occurs because of an incorrect pointer to the the top of the stack.\n\n### Patches\n0.3.0 / #2447\n\n*", id: "GHSA-xv8x-pr4h-73jv", modified: "2024-11-18T22:44:23Z", published: "2021-10-12T15:59:29Z", references: [ { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-xv8x-pr4h-73jv", }, { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-41121", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/2447", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/vyper/PYSEC-2021-365.yaml", }, { type: "PACKAGE", url: "https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, { score: "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N", type: "CVSS_V4", }, ], summary: "Memory corruption when returning a literal struct with a private call inside of it", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.