PYSEC-2022-131
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2022-02-03 12:15 - Updated: 2022-03-09 00:18Tensorflow is an Open Source Machine Learning Framework. The implementations of Sparse*Cwise* ops are vulnerable to integer overflows. These can be used to trigger large allocations (so, OOM based denial of service) or CHECK-fails when building new TensorShape objects (so, assert failures based denial of service). We are missing some validation on the shapes of the input tensors as well as directly constructing a large TensorShape with user-provided dimensions. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.8.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.7.1, TensorFlow 2.6.3, and TensorFlow 2.5.3, as these are also affected and still in supported range.
| Name | purl | tensorflow-gpu | pkg:pypi/tensorflow-gpu |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "tensorflow-gpu",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/tensorflow-gpu"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "e952a89b7026b98fe8cbe626514a93ed68b7c510"
},
{
"fixed": "1b54cadd19391b60b6fcccd8d076426f7221d5e8"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow",
"type": "GIT"
},
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.5.3"
},
{
"introduced": "2.6.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.6.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.12.0",
"0.12.1",
"1.0.0",
"1.0.1",
"1.1.0",
"1.10.0",
"1.10.1",
"1.11.0",
"1.12.0",
"1.12.2",
"1.12.3",
"1.13.1",
"1.13.2",
"1.14.0",
"1.15.0",
"1.15.2",
"1.15.3",
"1.15.4",
"1.15.5",
"1.2.0",
"1.2.1",
"1.3.0",
"1.4.0",
"1.4.1",
"1.5.0",
"1.5.1",
"1.6.0",
"1.7.0",
"1.7.1",
"1.8.0",
"1.9.0",
"2.0.0",
"2.0.1",
"2.0.2",
"2.0.3",
"2.0.4",
"2.1.0",
"2.1.1",
"2.1.2",
"2.1.3",
"2.1.4",
"2.2.0",
"2.2.1",
"2.2.2",
"2.2.3",
"2.3.0",
"2.3.1",
"2.3.2",
"2.3.3",
"2.3.4",
"2.4.0",
"2.4.1",
"2.4.2",
"2.4.3",
"2.4.4",
"2.5.0",
"2.5.1",
"2.5.2",
"2.6.0",
"2.6.1",
"2.6.2"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-23567",
"GHSA-rrx2-r989-2c43"
],
"details": "Tensorflow is an Open Source Machine Learning Framework. The implementations of `Sparse*Cwise*` ops are vulnerable to integer overflows. These can be used to trigger large allocations (so, OOM based denial of service) or `CHECK`-fails when building new `TensorShape` objects (so, assert failures based denial of service). We are missing some validation on the shapes of the input tensors as well as directly constructing a large `TensorShape` with user-provided dimensions. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.8.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.7.1, TensorFlow 2.6.3, and TensorFlow 2.5.3, as these are also affected and still in supported range.",
"id": "PYSEC-2022-131",
"modified": "2022-03-09T00:18:26.570322Z",
"published": "2022-02-03T12:15:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-rrx2-r989-2c43"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/tensorflow/security/advisory/tfsa-2021-198.md"
},
{
"type": "FIX",
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/e952a89b7026b98fe8cbe626514a93ed68b7c510"
},
{
"type": "FIX",
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/1b54cadd19391b60b6fcccd8d076426f7221d5e8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/5100e359aef5c8021f2e71c7b986420b85ce7b3d/tensorflow/core/kernels/sparse_dense_binary_op_shared.cc"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.