PYSEC-2026-4036
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2026-10-01 16:38 - Updated: 2026-10-01 17:10Impact
djust.tenants isolation was enforced only on the HTTP path. The current tenant was stored in threading.local() and set exclusively by the HTTP-only TenantMiddleware, so on the live (WebSocket/SSE) path get_current_tenant() was always None during mount and every event handler — and the tenant-aware QuerySet manager failed OPEN (returned the unfiltered queryset, ignoring STRICT_MODE), disclosing every tenant's rows to whoever held the socket. threading.local was additionally shared across connections on the sync_to_async executor thread.
Patches
Fixed in djust 1.0.7. Tenant storage moved to a contextvars.ContextVar (per async task); the resolved tenant is bound around WS/SSE mount and every dispatch; both managers scope the base queryset once and fail CLOSED (.none() under the default STRICT_MODE); and system check S006 warns when STRICT_MODE=False.
Workarounds
No workaround on the live path short of upgrading.
| Name | purl | djust | pkg:pypi/djust |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "djust",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/djust"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.0.7"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.1.0",
"0.1.2",
"0.1.3",
"0.1.4",
"0.1.5",
"0.1.6",
"0.1.7",
"0.1.8",
"0.1.9",
"0.2.0",
"0.2.1",
"0.2.2",
"0.3.0",
"0.3.1",
"0.3.2",
"0.3.4",
"0.3.5",
"0.3.6",
"0.3.7",
"0.3.8",
"0.4.0",
"0.4.1",
"0.4.2",
"0.4.3",
"0.4.4",
"0.9.0",
"0.9.1",
"0.9.2",
"0.9.4",
"0.9.5",
"0.9.6",
"0.9.7",
"1.0.0",
"1.0.0rc11",
"1.0.1",
"1.0.2",
"1.0.3",
"1.0.4",
"1.0.5",
"1.0.6"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-61595",
"GHSA-3492-cvg7-9mr2"
],
"details": "### Impact\n`djust.tenants` isolation was enforced only on the HTTP path. The current tenant was stored in `threading.local()` and set exclusively by the HTTP-only `TenantMiddleware`, so on the live (WebSocket/SSE) path `get_current_tenant()` was always `None` during mount and every event handler \u2014 and the tenant-aware `QuerySet` manager failed **OPEN** (returned the unfiltered queryset, ignoring `STRICT_MODE`), disclosing **every** tenant\u0027s rows to whoever held the socket. `threading.local` was additionally shared across connections on the `sync_to_async` executor thread.\n\n### Patches\nFixed in **djust 1.0.7**. Tenant storage moved to a `contextvars.ContextVar` (per async task); the resolved tenant is bound around WS/SSE mount and every dispatch; both managers scope the base queryset once and fail **CLOSED** (`.none()` under the default `STRICT_MODE`); and system check **S006** warns when `STRICT_MODE=False`.\n\n### Workarounds\nNo workaround on the live path short of upgrading.",
"id": "PYSEC-2026-4036",
"modified": "2026-10-01T17:10:21.158005Z",
"published": "2026-10-01T16:38:31.006339Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/djust-org/djust/security/advisories/GHSA-3492-cvg7-9mr2"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/djust-org/djust"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/djust-org/djust/releases/tag/v1.0.7"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://pypi.org/project/djust"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3492-cvg7-9mr2"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-61595"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "djust: Multi-tenant isolation fails open on the WebSocket/SSE path, disclosing other tenants\u0027 data"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.