PYSEC-2026-409

Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2026-06-29 11:50 - Updated: 2026-07-01 20:22
VLAI
Details

feiskyer/mcp-kubernetes-server through 0.1.11 allows OS command injection via the /mcp/kubectl endpoint. The handler constructs a shell command with user-supplied arguments and executes it with subprocess using shell=True, enabling injection through shell metacharacters (e.g., ;, &&, $()), even when the server is running in read-only mode.

A remote, unauthenticated attacker can execute arbitrary OS commands on the host, resulting in full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

This issue is distinct from mcp-server-kubernetes and from CVE-2025-53355.

Impacted products
Name purl
mcp-kubernetes-server pkg:pypi/mcp-kubernetes-server

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "mcp-kubernetes-server",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/mcp-kubernetes-server"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "0.1.11"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "0.1.0",
        "0.1.1",
        "0.1.10",
        "0.1.11",
        "0.1.2",
        "0.1.3",
        "0.1.4",
        "0.1.5",
        "0.1.6",
        "0.1.7",
        "0.1.8",
        "0.1.9"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-59377",
    "GHSA-4hqq-7q79-932p"
  ],
  "details": "`feiskyer/mcp-kubernetes-server` through **0.1.11** allows **OS command injection** via the `/mcp/kubectl` endpoint. The handler constructs a shell command with user-supplied arguments and executes it with `subprocess` using `shell=True`, enabling injection through shell metacharacters (e.g., `;`, `\u0026\u0026`, `$()`), even when the server is running in **read-only** mode.\n\nA remote, unauthenticated attacker can execute arbitrary OS commands on the host, resulting in full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.\n\nThis issue is **distinct from** `mcp-server-kubernetes` and from **CVE-2025-53355**.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2026-409",
  "modified": "2026-07-01T20:22:57.494412Z",
  "published": "2026-06-29T11:50:37.573909Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-59377"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/feiskyer/mcp-kubernetes-server"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/feiskyer/mcp-kubernetes-server/blob/78957b6c1a3982080cf6fcaac6f6e9014116a71c/src/mcp_kubernetes_server/command.py#L38"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/william31212/CVE-Requests-1896609"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.tenable.com/cve/CVE-2025-59377"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://pypi.org/project/mcp-kubernetes-server"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4hqq-7q79-932p"
    }
  ],
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "mcp-kubernetes-server has an OS Command Injection vulnerability"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…