ubuntu-cve-2016-10517
Vulnerability from osv_ubuntu
Published
2017-10-24 18:29
Modified
2025-09-08 16:43
Summary
Details

networking.c in Redis before 3.2.7 allows "Cross Protocol Scripting" because it lacks a check for POST and Host: strings, which are not valid in the Redis protocol (but commonly occur when an attack triggers an HTTP request to the Redis TCP port).

Severity
7.4 (High)
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
N/A (UNKNOWN)
medium
References
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "availability": "No subscription required",
        "binaries": [
          {
            "binary_name": "redis-server",
            "binary_version": "2:2.8.4-2ubuntu0.2"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "redis-tools",
            "binary_version": "2:2.8.4-2ubuntu0.2"
          }
        ]
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Ubuntu:14.04:LTS",
        "name": "redis",
        "purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/redis@2:2.8.4-2ubuntu0.2?arch=source\u0026distro=trusty"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2:2.8.4-2ubuntu0.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "2:2.6.13-1",
        "2:2.6.16-3",
        "2:2.8.0-1",
        "2:2.8.2-1",
        "2:2.8.4-2"
      ]
    },
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "availability": "No subscription required",
        "binaries": [
          {
            "binary_name": "redis-sentinel",
            "binary_version": "2:3.0.6-1ubuntu0.2"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "redis-server",
            "binary_version": "2:3.0.6-1ubuntu0.2"
          },
          {
            "binary_name": "redis-tools",
            "binary_version": "2:3.0.6-1ubuntu0.2"
          }
        ]
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Ubuntu:16.04:LTS",
        "name": "redis",
        "purl": "pkg:deb/ubuntu/redis@2:3.0.6-1ubuntu0.2?arch=source\u0026distro=xenial"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2:3.0.6-1ubuntu0.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "2:3.0.3-3",
        "2:3.0.5-1",
        "2:3.0.5-2",
        "2:3.0.5-3",
        "2:3.0.5-4",
        "2:3.0.6-1"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "details": "networking.c in Redis before 3.2.7 allows \"Cross Protocol Scripting\" because it lacks a check for POST and Host: strings, which are not valid in the Redis protocol (but commonly occur when an attack triggers an HTTP request to the Redis TCP port).",
  "id": "UBUNTU-CVE-2016-10517",
  "modified": "2025-09-08T16:43:59Z",
  "published": "2017-10-24T18:29:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2016-10517"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://github.com/antirez/redis/commit/874804da0c014a7d704b3d285aa500098a931f50"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.2/00-RELEASENOTES"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/redis/comments/5r8wxn/redis_327_is_out_important_security_fixes_inside/"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-10517"
    }
  ],
  "related": [],
  "schema_version": "1.7.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "medium",
      "type": "Ubuntu"
    }
  ],
  "upstream": [
    "CVE-2016-10517"
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.