CVE-2020-35510 (GCVE-0-2020-35510)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2021-06-02 13:22 – Updated: 2024-08-04 17:02
VLAI
Summary
A flaw was found in jboss-remoting in versions before 5.0.20.SP1-redhat-00001. A malicious attacker could cause threads to hold up forever in the EJB server by writing a sequence of bytes corresponding to the expected messages of a successful EJB client request, but omitting the ACK messages, or just tamper with jboss-remoting code, deleting the lines that send the ACK message from the EJB client code resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.
CWE
Assigner
redhat CNA under the redhat root
CNA scorecard B 82/100 over 1088 records in the last 180 days details
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
n/a jboss-remoting Affected: jboss-remoting 5.0.20.SP1-redhat-00001
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T17:02:08.052Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905796"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "jboss-remoting",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "jboss-remoting 5.0.20.SP1-redhat-00001"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A flaw was found in jboss-remoting in versions before 5.0.20.SP1-redhat-00001. A malicious attacker could cause threads to hold up forever in the EJB server by writing a sequence of bytes corresponding to the expected messages of a successful EJB client request, but omitting the ACK messages, or just tamper with jboss-remoting code, deleting the lines that send the ACK message from the EJB client code resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-400",
              "description": "CWE-400",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2021-06-02T13:22:16.000Z",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905796"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2020-35510",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "jboss-remoting",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "jboss-remoting 5.0.20.SP1-redhat-00001"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "A flaw was found in jboss-remoting in versions before 5.0.20.SP1-redhat-00001. A malicious attacker could cause threads to hold up forever in the EJB server by writing a sequence of bytes corresponding to the expected messages of a successful EJB client request, but omitting the ACK messages, or just tamper with jboss-remoting code, deleting the lines that send the ACK message from the EJB client code resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "CWE-400"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905796",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905796"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2020-35510",
    "datePublished": "2021-06-02T13:22:16.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2020-12-17T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T17:02:08.052Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2020-35510",
      "date": "2026-11-04",
      "epss": "0.01089",
      "percentile": "0.6546"
    },
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": [
        {
          "nodes": [
            {
              "cpeMatch": [
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss-remoting:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "matchCriteriaId": "62C98CF3-35A8-42CA-974F-C6232DA0BD5D",
                  "versionEndExcluding": "5.0.20",
                  "vulnerable": true
                },
                {
                  "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss-remoting:5.0.20:-:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                  "matchCriteriaId": "415F273E-9CBD-4266-8D2D-02C21A753C8A",
                  "vulnerable": true
                }
              ],
              "negate": false,
              "operator": "OR"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A flaw was found in jboss-remoting in versions before 5.0.20.SP1-redhat-00001. A malicious attacker could cause threads to hold up forever in the EJB server by writing a sequence of bytes corresponding to the expected messages of a successful EJB client request, but omitting the ACK messages, or just tamper with jboss-remoting code, deleting the lines that send the ACK message from the EJB client code resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability."
        },
        {
          "lang": "es",
          "value": "Se ha encontrado un fallo en jboss-remoting en versiones anteriores a 5.0.20.SP1-redhat-00001. Un atacante malicioso podr\u00eda causar que los hilos (subprocesos) se quedaran detenidos para siempre en el servidor EJB al escribir una secuencia de bytes correspondientes a los mensajes esperados de una petici\u00f3n de cliente EJB con \u00e9xito, pero omitiendo los mensajes ACK, o simplemente manipulando el c\u00f3digo de jboss-remoting, borrando las l\u00edneas que env\u00edan el mensaje ACK del c\u00f3digo del cliente EJB, resultando en una Denegaci\u00f3n de Servicio. La mayor amenaza de esta vulnerabilidad es la disponibilidad del sistema"
        }
      ],
      "id": "CVE-2020-35510",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T05:27:27.853",
      "metrics": {
        "cvssMetricV2": [
          {
            "acInsufInfo": false,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "cvssData": {
              "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
              "accessVector": "NETWORK",
              "authentication": "NONE",
              "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
              "baseScore": 7.1,
              "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
              "integrityImpact": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C",
              "version": "2.0"
            },
            "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
            "impactScore": 6.9,
            "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
            "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
            "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
            "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
            "type": "Primary",
            "userInteractionRequired": false
          }
        ],
        "cvssMetricV31": [
          {
            "cvssData": {
              "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
              "baseScore": 5.9,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
              "integrityImpact": "NONE",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
              "version": "3.1"
            },
            "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
            "impactScore": 3.6,
            "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
            "type": "Primary"
          }
        ]
      },
      "published": "2021-06-02T14:15:09.393",
      "references": [
        {
          "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
          "tags": [
            "Issue Tracking",
            "Vendor Advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905796"
        },
        {
          "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "tags": [
            "Issue Tracking",
            "Vendor Advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905796"
        }
      ],
      "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": [
        {
          "description": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CWE-400"
            }
          ],
          "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
          "type": "Primary"
        }
      ]
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "configurations": [
          {
            "nodes": [
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss-remoting:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "62C98CF3-35A8-42CA-974F-C6232DA0BD5D",
                    "versionEndExcluding": "5.0.20",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  },
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss-remoting:5.0.20:-:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "415F273E-9CBD-4266-8D2D-02C21A753C8A",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "A flaw was found in jboss-remoting in versions before 5.0.20.SP1-redhat-00001. A malicious attacker could cause threads to hold up forever in the EJB server by writing a sequence of bytes corresponding to the expected messages of a successful EJB client request, but omitting the ACK messages, or just tamper with jboss-remoting code, deleting the lines that send the ACK message from the EJB client code resulting in a denial of service. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "Se ha encontrado un fallo en jboss-remoting en versiones anteriores a 5.0.20.SP1-redhat-00001. Un atacante malicioso podr\u00eda causar que los hilos (subprocesos) se quedaran detenidos para siempre en el servidor EJB al escribir una secuencia de bytes correspondientes a los mensajes esperados de una petici\u00f3n de cliente EJB con \u00e9xito, pero omitiendo los mensajes ACK, o simplemente manipulando el c\u00f3digo de jboss-remoting, borrando las l\u00edneas que env\u00edan el mensaje ACK del c\u00f3digo del cliente EJB, resultando en una Denegaci\u00f3n de Servicio. La mayor amenaza de esta vulnerabilidad es la disponibilidad del sistema"
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2020-35510",
        "lastModified": "2024-11-21T05:27:27.853",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV2": [
            {
              "acInsufInfo": false,
              "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
              "cvssData": {
                "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
                "accessVector": "NETWORK",
                "authentication": "NONE",
                "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE",
                "baseScore": 7.1,
                "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
                "integrityImpact": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C",
                "version": "2.0"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
              "impactScore": 6.9,
              "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
              "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
              "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary",
              "userInteractionRequired": false
            }
          ],
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
                "baseScore": 5.9,
                "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
                "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
                "integrityImpact": "NONE",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
              "impactScore": 3.6,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary"
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2021-06-02T14:15:09.393",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
            "tags": [
              "Issue Tracking",
              "Vendor Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905796"
          },
          {
            "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
            "tags": [
              "Issue Tracking",
              "Vendor Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905796"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Modified",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-400"
              }
            ],
            "source": "secalert@redhat.com",
            "type": "Primary"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Moderate",
      "current_release_date": "2026-11-04T12:21:37+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2020-35510",
      "id": "CVE-2020-35510",
      "initial_release_date": "2020-12-09T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:fixed": "294",
      "product_status:known_affected": "13",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "jboss-remoting: Threads hold up forever in the EJB server by suppressing the ack from an EJB client",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2020/cve-2020-35510.json",
      "version": "3"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.