CVE-2024-30850 (GCVE-0-2024-30850)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-04-12 00:00 – Updated: 2026-04-03 18:08
VLAI

DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2024-33434. Reason: This record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-33434. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-33434 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage.

Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "cna": {
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-04-03T18:08:37.213Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "rejectedReasons": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2024-33434. Reason: This record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-33434. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-33434 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage."
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-30850",
    "datePublished": "2024-04-12T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateRejected": "2026-04-03T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2024-03-27T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-04-03T18:08:37.213Z",
    "state": "REJECTED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "An issue in tiagorlampert CHAOS v5.0.1 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the BuildClient function within client_service.go"
        },
        {
          "lang": "es",
          "value": "Un problema en tiagorlampert CHAOS v5.0.1 permite a un atacante remoto ejecutar c\u00f3digo arbitrario a trav\u00e9s de la funci\u00f3n BuildClient dentro de client_service.go"
        }
      ],
      "id": "CVE-2024-30850",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T09:12:27.960",
      "metrics": {
        "cvssMetricV31": [
          {
            "cvssData": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
              "baseScore": 8.8,
              "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
              "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
              "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
              "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
              "version": "3.1"
            },
            "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
            "impactScore": 5.9,
            "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
            "type": "Secondary"
          }
        ]
      },
      "published": "2024-04-12T06:15:06.943",
      "references": [
        {
          "source": "cve@mitre.org",
          "url": "https://blog.chebuya.com/posts/remote-code-execution-on-chaos-rat-via-spoofed-agents/"
        },
        {
          "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "url": "https://blog.chebuya.com/posts/remote-code-execution-on-chaos-rat-via-spoofed-agents/"
        }
      ],
      "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
      "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
      "weaknesses": [
        {
          "description": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CWE-77"
            }
          ],
          "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "type": "Secondary"
        }
      ]
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2024-33434. Reason: This record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-33434. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-33434 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2024-30850",
        "lastModified": "2026-04-03T19:16:58.563",
        "metrics": {},
        "published": "2024-04-12T06:15:06.943",
        "references": [],
        "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
        "vulnStatus": "Rejected"
      }
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": {
        "cna": {
          "providerMetadata": {
            "dateUpdated": "2026-04-03T18:08:37.213Z",
            "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
            "shortName": "mitre"
          },
          "rejectedReasons": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: CVE-2024-33434. Reason: This record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-33434. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-33434 instead of this record. All references and descriptions in this record have been removed to prevent accidental usage."
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "cveMetadata": {
        "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "assignerShortName": "mitre",
        "cveId": "CVE-2024-30850",
        "datePublished": "2024-04-12T00:00:00.000Z",
        "dateRejected": "2026-04-03T00:00:00.000Z",
        "dateReserved": "2024-03-27T00:00:00.000Z",
        "dateUpdated": "2026-04-03T18:08:37.213Z",
        "state": "REJECTED"
      },
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.