CVE-2026-44690 (GCVE-0-2026-44690)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-22 13:06 – Updated: 2026-07-22 18:56
VLAI
Title
Cross-zone wildcard cache poisoning via RRSIG.labels manipulation
Summary
In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.7.0 up to and including 1.25.1, insufficient validation of the RRSIG.Labels field combined with premature cache writes during RFC 8198 aggressive NSEC processing leads to cache poisoning that permits a malicious actor controlling a single delegated zone to poison arbitrary sibling zones under NSEC-signed parent domains. A malicious actor with one registered domain under an NSEC-signed TLD can serve malicious insecure DNS responses for unrelated sibling domains (sharing the same parent zone). Arbitrary delegations that do not exist under the parent domain and are covered by the parent's NSEC chain can be brought into insecure existence by fraudulent wildcard DS records (less labels than expected, unknown algorithm) from the malicious sibling domain. This allows the malicious actor to inject insecure wildcard records for those delegations.
Severity
7.5 (High)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-22 18:56 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-345 - Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Assigner
NLnet Labs CNA
CNA scorecard B 82/100 over 76 records in the last 180 days details
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
NLnet Labs Unbound Affected: 1.7.0 , < 1.25.2 (semver)
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Date Public
2026-07-22 00:00
Credits
Qifan Zhang (Palo Alto Networks)
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-44690",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-07-22T18:56:03.722157Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T18:56:16.014Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "Unbound",
          "vendor": "NLnet Labs",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "1.25.2",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "1.7.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "Qifan Zhang (Palo Alto Networks)"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.7.0 up to and including 1.25.1, insufficient validation of the RRSIG.Labels field combined with premature cache writes during RFC 8198 aggressive NSEC processing leads to cache poisoning that permits a malicious actor controlling a single delegated zone to poison arbitrary sibling zones under NSEC-signed parent domains. A malicious actor with one registered domain under an NSEC-signed TLD can serve malicious insecure DNS responses for unrelated sibling domains (sharing the same parent zone). Arbitrary delegations that do not exist under the parent domain and are covered by the parent\u0027s NSEC chain can be brought into insecure existence by fraudulent wildcard DS records (less labels than expected, unknown algorithm) from the malicious sibling domain. This allows the malicious actor to inject insecure wildcard records for those delegations."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-345",
              "description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T13:06:56.684Z",
        "orgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
        "shortName": "NLnet Labs"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-44690.txt"
        }
      ],
      "solutions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "This issue is fixed starting with version 1.25.2"
        }
      ],
      "timeline": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "Issue reported by Qifan Zhang"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "NLnet Labs shares patch"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "Qifan Zhang verifies patch"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "Multi-vendor coordinated fixes released with version 1.25.2"
        }
      ],
      "title": "Cross-zone wildcard cache poisoning via RRSIG.labels manipulation",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
    "assignerShortName": "NLnet Labs",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-44690",
    "datePublished": "2026-07-22T13:06:56.684Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-06-22T12:35:21.352Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T18:56:16.014Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-44690",
      "date": "2026-11-10",
      "epss": "0.00153",
      "percentile": "0.04469"
    },
    "microsoft_vex": {
      "current_release_date": "2026-07-23T14:42:48.000Z",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-44690",
      "id": "msrc_CVE-2026-44690",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-07-23T01:03:30.000Z",
      "product_status:fixed": "1",
      "product_status:known_affected": "1",
      "source": "Microsoft CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "Cross-zone wildcard cache poisoning via RRSIG.labels manipulation",
      "url": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/csaf/vex/2026/msrc_cve-2026-44690.json",
      "version": "2"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "affected": [
          {
            "affectedData": [
              {
                "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
                "product": "Unbound",
                "vendor": "NLnet Labs",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "lessThan": "1.25.2",
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "1.7.0",
                    "versionType": "semver"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "source": "sep@nlnetlabs.nl"
          }
        ],
        "configurations": [
          {
            "nodes": [
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:nlnetlabs:unbound:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "E2331CF5-0B7D-4505-A5A0-408593040279",
                    "versionEndExcluding": "1.25.2",
                    "versionStartIncluding": "1.7.0",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.7.0 up to and including 1.25.1, insufficient validation of the RRSIG.Labels field combined with premature cache writes during RFC 8198 aggressive NSEC processing leads to cache poisoning that permits a malicious actor controlling a single delegated zone to poison arbitrary sibling zones under NSEC-signed parent domains. A malicious actor with one registered domain under an NSEC-signed TLD can serve malicious insecure DNS responses for unrelated sibling domains (sharing the same parent zone). Arbitrary delegations that do not exist under the parent domain and are covered by the parent\u0027s NSEC chain can be brought into insecure existence by fraudulent wildcard DS records (less labels than expected, unknown algorithm) from the malicious sibling domain. This allows the malicious actor to inject insecure wildcard records for those delegations."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "En NLnet Labs Unbound 1.7.0 hasta la versi\u00f3n 1.25.1 inclusive, la validaci\u00f3n insuficiente del campo RRSIG.Labels combinada con escrituras prematuras en la cach\u00e9 durante el procesamiento agresivo de NSEC de RFC 8198 conduce a un envenenamiento de cach\u00e9 que permite a un actor malicioso que controla una \u00fanica zona delegada envenenar zonas hermanas arbitrarias bajo dominios padre firmados con NSEC. Un actor malicioso con un dominio registrado bajo un TLD firmado con NSEC puede servir respuestas DNS maliciosas e inseguras para dominios hermanos no relacionados (que comparten la misma zona padre). Delegaciones arbitrarias que no existen bajo el dominio padre y est\u00e1n cubiertas por la cadena NSEC del padre pueden ser tra\u00eddas a una existencia insegura mediante registros DS comod\u00edn fraudulentos (menos etiquetas de las esperadas, algoritmo desconocido) del dominio hermano malicioso. Esto permite al actor malicioso inyectar registros comod\u00edn inseguros para esas delegaciones."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2026-44690",
        "lastModified": "2026-10-24T13:10:00.147",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "baseScore": 7.5,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
                "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
              "impactScore": 3.6,
              "source": "sep@nlnetlabs.nl",
              "type": "Secondary"
            }
          ],
          "ssvcV203": [
            {
              "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "ssvcData": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-44690",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "technicalImpact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-07-22T18:56:03.722157Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              }
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2026-07-22T14:17:19.153",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "sep@nlnetlabs.nl",
            "tags": [
              "Vendor Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-44690.txt"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "sep@nlnetlabs.nl",
        "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-345"
              }
            ],
            "source": "sep@nlnetlabs.nl",
            "type": "Secondary"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "redhat_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "Important",
      "current_release_date": "2026-11-04T22:29:46+00:00",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-44690",
      "id": "CVE-2026-44690",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-07-22T00:00:00+00:00",
      "product_status:fixed": "200",
      "product_status:known_affected": "2",
      "product_status:known_not_affected": "10",
      "source": "Red Hat CSAF VEX",
      "status": "final",
      "title": "unbound: Unbound: Cache poisoning via insufficient RRSIG.Labels validation and premature cache writes",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-44690.json",
      "version": "3"
    },
    "suse_vex": {
      "aggregate_severity": "important",
      "current_release_date": "2026-09-11T01:16:01Z",
      "cve": "CVE-2026-44690",
      "id": "CVE-2026-44690",
      "initial_release_date": "2026-07-26T23:32:12Z",
      "product_status:known_affected": "56",
      "product_status:recommended": "102",
      "source": "SUSE CSAF VEX",
      "status": "interim",
      "title": "SUSE CVE CVE-2026-44690",
      "url": "https://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/security/csaf-vex/cve-2026-44690.json",
      "version": "13"
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": {
        "adp": [
          {
            "metrics": [
              {
                "other": {
                  "content": {
                    "id": "CVE-2026-44690",
                    "options": [
                      {
                        "Exploitation": "none"
                      },
                      {
                        "Automatable": "yes"
                      },
                      {
                        "Technical Impact": "partial"
                      }
                    ],
                    "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                    "timestamp": "2026-07-22T18:56:03.722157Z",
                    "version": "2.0.3"
                  },
                  "type": "ssvc"
                }
              }
            ],
            "providerMetadata": {
              "dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T18:56:12.325Z",
              "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
            },
            "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
          }
        ],
        "cna": {
          "affected": [
            {
              "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
              "product": "Unbound",
              "vendor": "NLnet Labs",
              "versions": [
                {
                  "lessThan": "1.25.2",
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "1.7.0",
                  "versionType": "semver"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "credits": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "finder",
              "value": "Qifan Zhang (Palo Alto Networks)"
            }
          ],
          "datePublic": "2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.7.0 up to and including 1.25.1, insufficient validation of the RRSIG.Labels field combined with premature cache writes during RFC 8198 aggressive NSEC processing leads to cache poisoning that permits a malicious actor controlling a single delegated zone to poison arbitrary sibling zones under NSEC-signed parent domains. A malicious actor with one registered domain under an NSEC-signed TLD can serve malicious insecure DNS responses for unrelated sibling domains (sharing the same parent zone). Arbitrary delegations that do not exist under the parent domain and are covered by the parent\u0027s NSEC chain can be brought into insecure existence by fraudulent wildcard DS records (less labels than expected, unknown algorithm) from the malicious sibling domain. This allows the malicious actor to inject insecure wildcard records for those delegations."
            }
          ],
          "metrics": [
            {
              "cvssV3_1": {
                "baseScore": 7.5,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "format": "CVSS",
              "scenarios": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "GENERAL"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "problemTypes": [
            {
              "descriptions": [
                {
                  "cweId": "CWE-345",
                  "description": "CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity",
                  "lang": "en",
                  "type": "CWE"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "providerMetadata": {
            "dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T13:06:56.684Z",
            "orgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
            "shortName": "NLnet Labs"
          },
          "references": [
            {
              "tags": [
                "vendor-advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-44690.txt"
            }
          ],
          "solutions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "This issue is fixed starting with version 1.25.2"
            }
          ],
          "timeline": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "time": "2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z",
              "value": "Issue reported by Qifan Zhang"
            },
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "time": "2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z",
              "value": "NLnet Labs shares patch"
            },
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "time": "2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z",
              "value": "Qifan Zhang verifies patch"
            },
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "time": "2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z",
              "value": "Multi-vendor coordinated fixes released with version 1.25.2"
            }
          ],
          "title": "Cross-zone wildcard cache poisoning via RRSIG.labels manipulation",
          "x_generator": {
            "engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
          }
        }
      },
      "cveMetadata": {
        "assignerOrgId": "206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6",
        "assignerShortName": "NLnet Labs",
        "cveId": "CVE-2026-44690",
        "datePublished": "2026-07-22T13:06:56.684Z",
        "dateReserved": "2026-06-22T12:35:21.352Z",
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-22T18:56:16.014Z",
        "state": "PUBLISHED"
      },
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Loading timeline…




    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.